Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:16:03.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revalidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter J. W. Wood*
Affiliation:
The Grange, 92 Whitcliffe Road, Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire BD19 3DR. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004

As a non-NHS forensic psychiatrist, practising predominantly medico-legal psychiatry, I have been concerned as to how I should go about the process of revalidation. I was greatly reassured at a recent lecture from a representative of the GMC (Dr Krishna Korlipara: Second Grange Conference, Lake Windermere, 11 October, 2003) that the GMC are particularly keen to avoid increasing the administrative burden on doctors during the process of revalidation. I was urged to seek out an ‘appraisal’ route to revalidation rather than taking the ‘independent’ route, and it was suggested that I should seek out individuals in a similar situation to myself and form a loose cooperative for the purposes of maintaining annual appraisal, tailored to our particular needs.

I would be most interested to hear from other practitioners not involved in NHS appraisal, predominantly working in the medico-legal field so as to explore the most effective way forward to maintaining an annual appraisal.

I look forward to hearing the views of others on this topic.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.