Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T07:11:05.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response from Professor R.G. Priest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R.G. Priest
R.G. Priest*
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School Praed Street London W2 1NY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Jadhav & Littlewood make some interesting and thoughtful points, but I cannot agree with some of their syllogisms. I certainly do not sympathise with the pejorative tone of their comments (“to mount a glossy [sic] campaign … is frankly disturbing”) nor accept what appears to be their principal conclusion that “the proposed educational programme is premature”.

Type
Briefings
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 18 , Issue 9 , September 1994 , pp. 573 - 574
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994

References

Paykel, E.S. & Priest, R.G. (1992) Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement. British Medical Journal, 305, 1198–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.