Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:10:36.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychiatrists' professional opinions to the media — revised guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The College
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2002. The Royal College of Psychiatrists

The College encourages psychiatrists to provide the media with expert and up-to-date information. The External Affairs Department retains a list of experts who are happy to deal with media inquiries.

Certain precautions need to be taken, especially when there is great pressure by the media for psychiatric opinions about individuals whose behaviour — often criminal or violent — has caused public concern. In these situations, it is essential that psychiatrists should (a) understand that they are absolutely entitled to make no comment; and (b) confine themselves to general statements about the behaviour or illness under discussion for the purpose of public education but avoid opinions about individuals. Psychiatrists should be particularly careful when the reporter is not known to them, or works for a tabloid known for sensational reporting — where the ‘reporting’ is often the sub-editing of the reporter's original material.

The American Psychiatric Association has issued ethical guidelines in this matter, as follows:

‘On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention, or who has disclosed information about him/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his/her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. It is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he/she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorisation for such a statement.’American Psychiatric Association, 2001; p. 11.

The College agrees with this principle. Speculation about persons a psychiatrist has never met could be damaging, both to the professional and to the profession as a whole.

The External Affairs Department is always willing to advise psychiatrists in their dealings with the media.

References

American Psychiatric Association (2001) The Principles of Medical Ethics. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.