Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:27:30.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Police case disposal: an introduction for psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Adrian R. Brown*
Affiliation:
Wathwood Hospital, Gypsy Green Lane, Wath-Upon-Dearne, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S63 7TQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2002. The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: Bayney and Ikkos (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2002, 26, 182-185) provide a helpful outline of the elements of the police decision-making process with respect to referrals of those with mental disorder. However, they make two important omissions. The first, and most significant, is the implication that the decision to prosecute is a police one. It should be emphasised that while the investigation of crime is undoubtedly a core police role, the decision to prosecute lies with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and not with the police force. It is the role of the police to charge an individual if they feel it appropriate and to then refer the case to the CPS for consideration.

Second, the role of the CPS at the pre- and post-charge stages is not included. The Code for Crown Prosecutors (Crown Prosecution Service, 2000) notes that both before referring a case and during the prosecution, the police have a key liaison role. This role involves both discussing cases in which a decision to make a formal CPS referral has not yet been made, and in providing further information to the CPS as a prosecution proceeds. The police and the CPS, although independent of each other, are fundamentally linked, and the omission of the CPS impairs a full appreciation of the process under scrutiny.

References

Crown Prosecution Service (2000) The Code for Crown Prosecutors. London: Crown Prosecution Service.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.