Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:28:12.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Police and sniffer dogs in psychiatric settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Najat Khalifa
Affiliation:
Section of Forensic Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA, email: [email protected]
Simon Gibbon
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham
Conor Duggan
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims and Method

To study the views of staff and patients on the use of sniffer dogs to detect illicit drugs and the prosecution of in-patients suspected of taking illicit drugs. A 15-item self-report questionnaire was given to all in-patients and staff who had any contact with patients in a medium-secure unit. Responses to the individual statements were measured on a five-point Likert scale and staff and patients' responses were compared.

Results

We achieved a response rate of 63% (patient response rate, 71.6%; staff response rate, 60.7%). Overall there were fewer differences than anticipated, although, as expected, staff viewed the impact of illicit drugs more negatively than patients, and on the other hand, patients viewed the use of sniffer dogs and police involvement more negatively than the staff did.

Clinical Implications

Notice ought to be taken of the discordance between staff and patients' views (particularly in relation to consent and confidentiality) when attempting to detect and manage illicit drug use among psychiatric in-patients.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

References

Bartels, S. J., Teague, G. B. & Drake, R. E. (1993) Substance abuse in schizophrenia: service utilization and costs. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 227232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayney, R. & Ikkos, G. (2003) Managing criminal acts on the psychiatric ward: understanding the police view. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 359367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1999) The Code of Practice to the Mental Health Act 1983 (revised). TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Dolan, M. & Kirwan, H. (2001) Survey of staff perceptions of illicit drug use among patients in a medium secure unit. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, M., Lelliott, P., & Coyle, N. (2006) Availability of treatment for substance misuse in medium secure psychiatric care in England: a national survey. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 611625.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1999) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital (CM4194–11). TSO (The Stationery Office) (http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm41/4194/ash4194.htm).Google Scholar
Gordon, H. & Haider, D. (2004) The use of ‘drug dogs’ in psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 196198.Google Scholar
Mckeown, M. & Liebling, H. (1995) Staff perception of illicit drug use within a special hospital. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2, 343350.Google Scholar
Mcphillips, M. A., Strang, J. & Barnes, T. R. (1998) Hair analysis: new laboratory ability to test for substance use. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 287290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, M. (2005) Who let the dogs in? The use of drug sniffer dogs in mental health settings. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 12, 745749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rands, G. (2004) The use of ‘drug dogs’ in psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 383.Google Scholar
Wolff, K., Farrell, M., Marsden, J., et al (1999) A review of biological indicators of illicit drug use, practical considerations and clinical usefulness. Addiction, 94, 12791298.Google Scholar
R v. Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority and the Secretary of State for the Department of Health Ex parte S, H & D [1998] COD 199.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.