Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:50:16.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale among psychiatrists and general practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter Aitken  and
Robin Jacobson
Peter Aitken*
Affiliation:
Section of Psychosomatic and Liaison Medicine, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Jenner Wing, St George's Hospital Medical School Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
Robin Jacobson
Affiliation:
Section of Psychosomatic and Liaison Medicine, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Jenner Wing, St George's Hospital Medical School Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
*
∗Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim was to examine the impression that both general practitioners and psychiatrists have a low level of awareness and knowledge of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), have little experience in its use, and would not feel confident in giving advice on issues arising from its use by health visitors.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 21 , Issue 9 , September 1997 , pp. 550 - 552
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Bennett, A. E. & Ritchie, K. (1975) The self administered questionnaire. In Questionnaires in Medicine – A Guide to Their Design and Use, pp. 55–58. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M. & Sagovsky, R. (1987) Detection of post-natal depression: development of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1992) Early diagnosis and secondary prevention. In Prevention of Anxiety and Depression in General Practice (ed. Jenkins, R.), pp. 33–39. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Holden, J. (1994) Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in clinical practice. In Perinatal Psychiatry – Use and Misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (eds Cox, J. & Holden, J.), p. 133. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Holden, J., Sagovsky, R. & Cox, J. L. (1989) Counselling in general practice setting: controlled study of health visitors' intervention in treatment of postnatal depression. British Medical Journal, 298, 223–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, M., Blizard, R. & Mann, A. (1995) General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 89–92.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. & Robson, K. M. (1984) A prospective study of emotional disorders in child bearing women. British Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 35–47.Google Scholar
Murray, L. & Stein, A. (1989) The effects of postnatal depression on the infant. In Psychological Aspects of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ed. Oates, M. R.), pp. 921–935. London: Baillière-Tindall.Google Scholar
O'Hara, M. W. (1994) Postpartum depression: identification and measurement in a cross-cultural context. In Perinatal Psychiatry – Use and Misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (eds Cox, J. & Holden, J.), pp. 145–168. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Watson, J. P., Elliott, S. A., Rugg, A. J., et al (1984) Psychiatric disorders in pregnancy and the first postnatal year. British Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 453–462.Google Scholar
Wright, A. F. & Anderson, A. J. B. (1995) Newly identified psychiatric illness in one general practice: 12 month outcome and the influence of the patients' personality. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 89–92.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.