Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:26.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing the cross-fertilisation of ideas between training schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David White*
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Service, Fieldhead House, 2–8 St Martin's Avenue, Listerhills, Bradford BD7 1LG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sir: I have had the opportunity, as the specialist registrar representative on a Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Special Advisory Sub-Committee team, to visit a different child and adolescent training scheme than my own. This was a very interesting experience both with regard to the process of the visit and seeing how another scheme functions. It also exposed me to new ideas about training. I strongly support the view expressed by Laurence Sheldon (1994) that approval visits should be open for any interested specialist registrar and recommend other trainees to consider offering themselves for approval visits.

Type
Correspondence
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Sheldon, L. (1994) Use of approval visits by the CTC. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.