Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:26:27.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Union government legislation affecting psychiatric practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jim van Os  and
Jan Neeleman
Jim van Os*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College Hospital and Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
Jan Neeleman
Affiliation:
Maudsley and Bethlem Royal Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
*
∗Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although the process of psychiatric reform is taking place across Europe, national political, economic and historical factors determine to a large extent the manner and pace of its implementation as well as its final shape. The degree of centralisation of health care systems and the degree of prominence of primary care affect how efficiently change can be achieved. Various forms of professional resistance may, in different degrees in European countries, hamper the implementation of community care. The widely varying contexts in which psychiatric reform takes place throughout Europe, should provide a fertile area for future comparative research.

Type
Original papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 18 , Issue 7 , July 1994 , pp. 390 - 394
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994

References

Barres, M. (1987) Sectorisation and overcapacity in France. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 140–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, D.H. (1991) The international perspective. In Community Psychiatry: The Principles (eds Bennett, D.H. & Freeman, H.L.). Edinburgh/London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. (1987) Mental health care models and their evaluation: the West German experience. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duran, E. & Blanes, T. (1991) Spain: democracy followed by devolution. In Mental Health in the Global Village (eds. Araya, R. & Appleby, L.) pp 54–68. London: Gaskell. (Royal College of Psychiatrists).Google Scholar
Gersons, B., Van De Graaf, W., Rijkschroef, R. et al. (1992) The mental health care transformation process: the Amsterdam experience. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 38, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giel, R. (1987) The jigsaw puzzle of Dutch mental health care. International Journal of Mental Health, 16, 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. & Tantam, D. (1989) The public health impact of mental disorders. In Oxford Textbook of Public Health (Eds Holland, W. & Detels, R.) pp 267–279.Google Scholar
Haerlin, C. (1987) Community care in West Germany: concept and reality. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hest, F.P. & Wolters, R.J. (1992) Deeltijdbehandeling in Engeland en Wales. Tÿdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 32, 354–361.Google Scholar
Holloway, F. (1990) Caring for People: a critical review of British Government policy for the community care of the mentally ill. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 641–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. & Poletti, A. (1985) Understanding the Italian experience. British Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunze, H. (1977) Psychiatrie-Reform zu Lasten der chronischen Patienten? Entwicklungstendenzen der stationären Versorgung chronisch Kranker in England, den USA und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Nervenarzt, 48, 83–88.Google Scholar
Mangen, S. (1987) Mental health policies in Europe: an analysis of priorities and problems. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, B. (1987) Housing and employment: rehabilitative measures in Denmark. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 137–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, D. (1990) Introduction to Social Security Law of the Member States of the EC. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Regionaal Instituut Voor Ambulante Geestelijke Gezondheizorg (RIAGG, 1992) RIAGGs in Cÿfers, Amsterdam: NVAGG.Google Scholar
Rössler, W. & Salize, H.J. (1994) Longitudinal statistics of mental health care in Germany. Social Psychiatry (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, L.A., Zeelan, J. & Waismann, L.C. (1992) Patterns of service for the long-term mentally ill in Europe. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarantidis, D., Kladouchos, V., Tripodianakis, J. et al. (1992) The reform of psychiatric care in Greece: 1983–1989. European Psychiatry, 7, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrameijer, F. (1987) New comprehensive mental health authorities in The Netherlands. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 33, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrie, C.M. (1992) Mental health services in Germany. Psychiatric Bulletin, 16, 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Os, J., Galdos, P., Lewis, G., Mann, A. & Bourgeois, M. (1993) Schizophrenia sans frontières: concepts of schizophrenia among French and British psychiatrists. British Medical Journal, 307, 489–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Os, J., & Neeleman, J. (1994b) Mental illness in Europe. British Medical Journal (in press).Google Scholar
Van Os, J., Osacar, A. & Segovia, M. (1992) Rehabilitación de los manicomios? Anales de Psiquiatria, 10, 383–388.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. A caring community? Sunday Times, 3 May 1987.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.