No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A discussion at the Philosophy Group's first residential conference
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Two theoretical positions in psychiatry, the psychodynamic and the biological are explored, as seen in a discussion at the conference mentioned. It is argued that they form part of a wider philosophical debate between idealism and materialism, which is explored with reference to ideas about substance and then using psychodynamic and biological theories of depression. Double aspect theory is presented as a pragmatic solution adopted by the profession.
- Type
- Personal columns
- Information
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992
References
Descartes, R. (1983) The Essential Descartes (ed. Wilson, M. G.). New York: New American Library. Pp. 264–227.Google Scholar
Fish, F. (1985) Fish's Clinical Psychopathology (ed. Hamilton, M.). Bristol: John Wright. Pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1985) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. (ed. Yolton, J. W.). London: J. M. Dent. Pp. 131–150.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1962) Materialism, past and present. In The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell (eds. Egner, R. E. and Dennon, L. E.). London: George Allen and Unwin. Pp. 236–245.Google Scholar
Russell, B., (1985) A History of Western Philosophy.
London: Unwin Paperbacks. Pp. 542–551.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1955) On the Improvement of the Understanding; The Ethics; Correspondence.
London: Constable. Pp. 45–81.Google Scholar
Vesey, G., (1968) Agent and Spectator.
Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.