Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-26wn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T10:29:10.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Road Since Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Thomas S. Kuhn
Thomas S. Kuhn*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On this occasion, and in this place, I feel that I ought, and am probably expected, to look back at the things which have happened to the philosophy of science since I first began to take an interest in it over half a century ago. But I am both too much an outsider and too much a protagonist to undertake that assignment. Rather than attempt to situate the present state of philosophy of science with respect to its past — a subject on which I’ve little authority — I shall try to situate my present state in philosophy of science with respect to its own past — a subject on which, however imperfect, I’m probably the best authority there is.

As a number of you know, I’m at work on a book, and what I mean to attempt here is an exceedingly brief and dogmatic sketch of its main themes. I think of my project as a return, now underway for a decade, to the philosophical problems left over from the Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

Type
Part I. Presidential Address
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biagioli, M. (1990), “The Anthropology of Incommensurability,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21:183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1982), “Language, Truth and Reason,” in Rationality and Relativism, Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. (1990), Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hull, D.I. (1976), “Are Species Really Individual?”, Systematic Zoology. 25:174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1983a), “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability,” PSA 198., Volume Two. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 669–688.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1983b), “Rationality and Theory Choice,” Journal of Philosophy. 80: 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1987), “What are Scientific Revolutions?” in The Probabilistic Revolution, Volume 1: Ideas in History. Kröger, L., Daston, L.J., and Heidelberger, M. (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1990), “Dubbing and Redubbing: the Vulnerabiltity of Rigid s Designation,” in Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of 2 Science, XIV, C.W., Savage (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 298–318.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977), Semantics, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. (1978), “Adaptation,” Scientific America. 239: 212–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, H. (1978), Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar