Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:27:04.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Principles of Biological Classification: The Use and Abuse of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

David L. Hull
David L. Hull*
Affiliation:
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years two groups of taxonomists have attempted to influence the general goals and methods of biological classification. The first group, which emerged in the late 1950’s, has been called variously neo-Adansonian, numerical, computer and phenetic taxonomy. The founders of this school, Robert R. Sokal and P.H.A. Sneath, termed their unified approach to systematics “neo-Adansonian” because of the affinities which they saw between their views and those of the 18th century botanist, Michel Adanson (1727-1806). Today little mention is made of Adanson. His ideas turned out not to be as prescient as Sokal and Sneath had at first thought. Besides, he had served his purpose as a patron saint ([79], p. 23). Sokal and Sneath also termed their approach “numerical” because they believed that taxonomists should make greater use of available mathematical techniques. Not only should taxonomic characters be coded quantitatively but also estimates of affinity should be made on the basis of explicitly stated clustering procedures.

Type
Part IV. The Purposes of Biological Classification
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 130 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Footnotes

1

The research for this paper was supported by NSF grant Soc 75 03535. I wish to thank Steve Farris, Norman Platnick and Michael Ruse for their comments.

References

[1] Beckner, M. The Biological Way of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bock, W.J. “Nonvalidity of the ‘Phylogenetic Fallacy.’” Systematic Zoology 18(1969): 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bock, W.J. “Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary Classification;” Systematic Zoology 22(1973): 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bock, W.J. “Foundations and Methods of Evolutionary Classification.” In Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Edited by Hecht, Max K., Goody, P.C. and Hecht, B.M. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1977. Pages 851–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Bonde, N. “Origin of ‘Higher Groups’: Viewpoints of Phylogenetic Systematics.” In Problèmes Actuels de Paléontologie-Évolution des Vertébrés. Paris: Colloque Paléontologiques, No. 239, 1975. Pages 293–324.Google Scholar
[6] Bonde, N. “Cladistic Classification as Applied to Vertebrates.” In Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Edited by Hecht, Max, Goody, P.C. and Hecht, B.M. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1977. Pages 741–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Bridgman, P.W. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan Company, 1927.Google Scholar
[8] Bridgman, P.W. The Nature of Physical Theory. New York: Dover Publishing Company, 1936.Google Scholar
[9] Brundin, L. “Evolution, Causal Biology, and Classification.” Zoologica Scripta 1(1972): 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Colless, D. “The Phylogenetic Fallacy.” Systematic Zoology 16(1967): 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Colless, D. “The Interpretation of Hennig’s ‘Phylogenetic Systematics’ — A Reply to Dr. Schlee.” Systematic Zoology 18(1969): 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Colless, D. “The Phylogenetic Fallacy Revisited.” Systematic Zoology 18(1969): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Cracraft, J. “Phylogenetic Models and Classification.” Systematic Zoology 23(1974): 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Cracraft, J. “Science, Philosophy, and Systematics.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 213–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Crowson, R.A. Classification and Biology. New York: Atherton Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[16] Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species, A Facsimile of the First Edition (1859). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[17] Darwin, F. (ed.). The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1899.Google Scholar
[18] Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[19] Eldredge, N. “Cladism and Common Sense.” In Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Edited by Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979. Pages 165–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative Model to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology. Edited by Schopf, T.J.M.. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Company, 1972. Pages 82–115.Google Scholar
[21] Enc, B. “Spiral Dependence between Theories and Taxonomy.” Inquiry 19(1974): 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Engelmann, G.F. and Wiley, E.O. “The Place of Ancestor-Descendant Relationships in Phylogeny Reconstruction.” Systematic Zoology 26(1977): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Farris, S.J. “A Methodological Solution to a Philosophical Problem.” Paper read at the 1978 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
[24] Gaffney, E.S. “An Introduction to the Logic of Phylogeny Reconstruction.” In Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Edited by Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979. Pages 79–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Gasking, D. “Clusters.” Australasian Review of Psychology 38(1960): 1–36.Google Scholar
[26] Ghiselin, M. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23(1974): 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Gilmour, J.S.L. “A Taxonomic Problem.” Nature 139(1937): 1040–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Gilmour, J.S.L. “Taxonomy and Philosophy.” In The New Systematics. Edited by Huxley, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1940. Pages 461–474.Google Scholar
[29] Gregg, J.R. “Taxonomy, Language, and Reality.” American Naturalist 84(1950): 421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Griffiths, G.C.D. “On the Foundations of Biological Systematics.” Acta Biotheoretica 23(1974): 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Hempel, C.G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[32] Hennig, W. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag, 1950.Google Scholar
[33] Hennig, W. Phylogenetic Systematics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[34] Hull, D.L. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 16 (1965): 314–326, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Hull, D.L. “Certainty and Circularity in Evolutionary Taxonomy.” Evolution 21(1967): 174–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[36] Hull, D.L. ‘The Operational Imperative — Sense and Nonsense in Operationism.” Systematic Zoology 17(1968): 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] Hull, D.L. Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
[38] Hull, D.L. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25(1976): 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[39] Hull, D.L. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45(1978): 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40] Hull, D.L. “Planck’s Principle.” Science 202 (1978): 717–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[41] Hull, D.L. “The Limits of Cladism.” Systematic Zoology 28(1979): 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[42] Hull, D.L. “The Units of Evolution.” In The Philosophy of Evolution. Edited by Jensen, U.J. and Harré, R. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.Google Scholar
[43] Jevons, W.S. The Principles of Science (1892). New York: Dover Publications, 1958.Google Scholar
[44] Kitts, D.B. “Karl Popper, Verifiability, and Systematic Zoology.” Systematic Zoology 26(1977): 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[45] Kitts, D.B. “Theoretics and Systematics: A Reply to Cracraft, Nelson, and Patterson.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[46] Löther, R. Die Beherrschung der Mannigfaltigkeit. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1972.Google Scholar
[47] Mayr, E. Principles of Systematics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
[48] Mayr, E. “Evolution.” Scientific American 239 #3(1978): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[49] Mill, J.S. A System of Logic. 8th ed. London: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1872.Google Scholar
[50] Mill, J.S. Three Essays on Religion (1874). New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1958.Google Scholar
[51] Nelson, G. “‘Cladism’ as a Philosophy of Classification.” Systematic Zoology 20(1971): 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[52] Nelson, G. “Comments on Hennig’s ‘Phylogenetic Systematics’ and Its Influence on Ichthyology.” Systematic Zoology 21 (1972): 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[53] Nelson, G. “Classification as an Expression of Phylogenetic Relationship.” Systematic Zoology 22(1973): 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[54] Nelson, G. “Classification and Prediction: A Reply to Kitts.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 216–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[55] Nelson, G. “Cladistic Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions.” Systematic Zoology 28(1979): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[56] Olding, A. “A Defence of Evolutionary Laws.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29(1978): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[57] Patterson, C. “Verifiability in Systematics.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[58] Platnick, N. “Cladograms, Phylogenetic Trees, and Hypothesis Testing.” Systematic Zoology (1977): 438–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[59] Platnick, N. and Cameron, H.D. “Cladistic Methods in Textual, Linguistic, and Phylogenetic Analysis.” Systematic Zoology 26(1977): 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[60] Platnick, N. and Gaffney, E. “Systematics: A Popperian Perspective.” Systematic Zoology 26(1977): 360–365.Google Scholar
[61] Platnick, N. and Gaffney, E. “Evolutionary Biology: A Popperian Approach.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[62] Platnick, N. and Nelson, G. “The Purposes of Biological Classification.” In PSA 1978, Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Hacking, I. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1981. Pages 117–129.Google Scholar
[63] Popper, K.R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: G. Routledge and Sons, 1945.Google Scholar
[64] Popper, K.R. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
[65] Popper, K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.Google Scholar
[66] Popper, K.R. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books, 1962.Google Scholar
[67] Popper, K.R. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[68] Popper, K.R. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[69] Pratt, V. “Numerical Taxonomy.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 36(1972): 581–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[70] Ruse, M. “Definitions of Species in Biology.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20(1969): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[71] Ruse, M. “Are There Laws of Biology?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48(1970): 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[72] Ruse, M. The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchinson University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[73] Ruse, M. “The Scientific Methodology of William Whewell.” Centaurus 20(1976): 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[74] Ruse, M. “Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Biology.” Philosophy of Science 44(1977): 638–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[75] Schlee, D. “The Interpretation of Hennig’s Systematics, an ‘Intuitive, Statistico-Phenetic Taxonomy’?” Systematic Zoology 18 (1969): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[76] Simpson, G.G. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[77] Smart, J.J.C. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
[78] Smart, J.J.C. “Under the Form of Eternity.” The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Annual Review (1976-7): 36–42.Google Scholar
[79] Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
[80] Sokal, R.R. and Sneath, P.H.A. The Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1963.Google Scholar
[81] Whewell, W. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Vol. I. London: John Parker, 1847.Google Scholar
[82] Whewell, W. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Vol. II. London: John Parker, 1847.Google Scholar
[83] Wiley, E.O. “The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered.” Systematic Zoology 27(1978): 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[84] Wilson, L.G. Sir Charles Lyell’s Scientific Journals on the Species Question. Hew Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[85] Woodger, J.H. “From Biology to Mathematics.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3(1952): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar