Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T17:21:40.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multivariate Models of Scientific Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Miriam Solomon
Miriam Solomon*
Affiliation:
Temple University and The Dibner Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Philosophers are particularly susceptible to the temptation to produce what Donna Haraway calls a “TOE (=a Theory of Everything)” (Haraway 1994). Many of us like to integrate the methods and results of different disciplines, discern underlying unity in bifurcations and thereby—so we think—get closer to a single, true, representation of the universe. Proposals to integrate cognitive and social models of scientific change have come from philosophers—and not from historians, sociologists, feminist critics, anthropologists, rhetoricians or semioticians of science. The proposals are also responses to the growing influence of sociologists of science (e.g. Collins, Latour, Shapin, Woolgar) who have taken stands on epistemological matters, formerly the province of philosophers. It is common among sociologists of science to reject all proposals to integrate cognitive and social accounts, as well as to reject all cognitive accounts: Bruno Latour's famous moratorium on cognitive studies of science (Latour 1987, 247) is one example of this.

Type
Part IX. Integrating Cognitive and Social Models of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 287 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Biology and Gender Study Group (1988), “The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology,” Hypatia 3:1. Reprinted in ed. Tuana, Nancy, Feminism and Science (1989). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 172–187.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. (1988), Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. (1992),, Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. and Shaked, M. (1992), “An Economic Model of Scientific Activity and Truth Acquisition”. In Goldman (1992), 227-254.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1994), “A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies” Configurations 1, 59–71.10.1353/con.1994.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P. (1994), Mental Leaps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1988), Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, E. (1985), Reflections on Gender and Science. New York and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. (1993), Inductive Inference and its Natural Ground. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1969), “Epistemology Naturalized”. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodeghier, M. (1993), “Factors influencing attitudes toward controversial research: quantitatively disentangling the social from the scientific”. Talk, Society for Social Studies of Science Meetings 1993, part of PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Sapp, J. (1987), Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. (1992), “Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning” Philosophy of Science 59:3, 439–455.10.1086/289680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. (1994a), “Social Empiricism”. Nous 28:3, 325–343.10.2307/2216062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. (1994b), “A More Social Epistemology”. In ed. Fred Schmitt, Socializing Epistemology, 217-233. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. (forthcoming), “Naturalism and Generality”, Philosophical Psychology.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. (manuscript), “Is There An Invisible Hand of Reason?” Presented at a conference “Non-Formal Foundations of Reason,” Newcastle, Australia, August 1993. Forthcoming with proceedings of the conference.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (1990), Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. (1990), “Orthodoxy and Innovation in Science: The Influence of Birth Order in a Multivariate Context”. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, New Orleans, 16 February.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. (1995), Born To Rebel: Radical Thinking in Science and Social Thought. In preparation. Cambridge Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Science and Technology Studies Department.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1989), “Scientific Cognition: Hot or Cold?” in Fuller, Steve et al (eds.) The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (1990), “The Conceptual Structure of the Chemical Revolution” Philosophy of Science 57:2, 183–209.10.1086/289543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (1992), Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (1993), “Societies of Minds: Science as Distributed Computing” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 24:1, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (1994), “Mind, Society and the Growth of Knowledge” Philosophy of Science 61:4, 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. (1985), Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar