Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:14:30.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meaning in a Material Medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Davis Baird
Davis Baird*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On September 3 and 4, 1821 Michael Faraday, age 30, performed a series of experiments which ultimately produced what were called “electromagnetic rotations.” Faraday showed how an appropriately organized combination of electric and magnetic elements would produce rotary motion. He invented the first electric motor.

Faraday's work resulted in several “products.” He published several papers describing his discovery (Faraday 1821; 1821-2; 1822c). He wrote letters to many scientific colleagues (Faraday 1812-48, pp. 122-39). He built, or had built, several copies of an apparatus which, requiring no experimental knowledge or dexterity on the part of its user, would display the notable rotations (Faraday 1822a; 1822b). He shipped these to his scientific colleagues (Faraday 1812-48, pp. 128-9). It is this material product which I would like to focus on.

For the presentation of this talk in New Orleans, I intended to have my own version of Faraday's first electric motor.

Type
Part XIV. The Technological Infrastructure of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 441 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackermann, R. (1985), Data, Instruments, and Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. (1993), “Analytical Chemistry and the ‘Big’ Scientific Instrumentation Revolution”, Annals of Science, 50: 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. and Faust, T. (1990), “Scientific Instruments, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 41: 147-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. and Nordmann, A. (1994), “Facts-well-Put”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45: 37–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraday, M. (1812-48), The Selected Correspondence of Michael Faraday, Volume 1, 1812-1848, Williams, L. P. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Published in 1971.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1821), “On some new Electromagnetical Motions, and the on the Theory of Magnetism”, Quarterly Journal of Science, 12: 74–96.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1821-2), “Historical Sketch of Electro-magnetism”, Annals of Philosophy, 18: 195–200, 274-90, 19:107-21.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1822a), “Electro-magnetic Rotations Apparatus”, Quarterly Journal of Science, 12: 186.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1822b), “Description of an Electro-magnetical Apparatus for the exhibition of rotatory motion”, Quarterly Journal of Science, 12: 285-5.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1822c), “Note on new electro-magnetical motions”, Quarterly Journal of Science, 12: 416-21.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. (1993), Engineering and the Mind's Eye, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (1990), Experiment: Right or Wrong, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. (1985), “Bubble Chambers and the Experimental Workplace”, In Achinstein, P. and Hannaway, O. (eds.),Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, pp. 309-73.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1987), How Experiments End, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1988), “History, Philosophy, and the Central Metaphor”, In Lenoir (ed.), pp. 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. and Assmus, E. (1988), “Arificial Clouds, Real Particles”, In Gooding et. al. (eds.), pp. 225–274.Google Scholar
Gooding, D., Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (eds.) (1988), The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gooding, D., Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (1990), Experiment and the Making of Meaning, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helden, A. V. and Hankins, T. (eds.) (1993), “Instruments”, Osiris, Second Series, 9.Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (1991), Instrumental Realism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
King, H. (1978) Geared to the Stars, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woogar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life, Beverly Hills: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, T. (ed.) (1988), “Practice, Context, and the Dialogue Between Theory and Experiment”, Science in Context, 2(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, T. (1993), “Helmholtz and the Materialities of Communication”, in Helden and Hankins (eds.), pp. 183–207.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Price, D. de, S. (1964), “Automata and the origins of Mechanism and Mechanistic Philosophy”, Technology and Culture, 5: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D. de, S. (1984), “Notes Towards a Philosophy of the Science/Technology Interaction”, In Lauden, R. (ed.), The Nature of Technological Change, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. (1983), Stronger than a Hundred Men, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. (1987), Knowledge and Power, Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. (1993), “Machine Philosophy: Demonstration Devices in Georgian Mechanics”, in Helden and Hankins (eds.), pp. 157-83.Google Scholar
Smeaton, J. (1759), “An Experimental Examination of the Quantity and Proportion of Mechanic Power necessary to be employed in giving Different Degrees of Velocity of Heavy Bodies from a State of Rest”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, reprinted in Hutton et. al. (eds.) (1809), The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London From Their Commencement in 1665 to the year 1800, Abridged with notes and illustrations, London: C. and R. Baldwin, 14: 72-84.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Wise, N. (1989), Energy and Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. (1979), “The Air-Propeller Tests of W. F. Durand and E. P. Lesley: A Case Study in Technological Methodology”, Technology and Culture, 20: 712-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincenti, W. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. (1978), Album of Science: The Nineteenth Century, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. (1964), Michael Faraday: A Biography, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wise, N. (1988), “Mediating Machines”, In Lenoir (ed.), pp. 77-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar