Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:20:54.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lorentz Invariant State Reduction, and Localization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Gordon N. Fleming
Gordon N. Fleming*
Affiliation:
Penn State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I will present conceptions of state reduction and particle and/or system localization which render these subjects fully compatible with the general requirements of a relativistic, i.e. Lorentz invariant, quantum theory. In the case of state reduction, the concept presented has, in it's main features, been advanced by several investigators in recent years, (Giovannini 1983), (Aharonov and Albert 1984), (Malin 1984), (Dieks 1985). My own contribution to this topic has been to elaborate the concept in question and examine, in some detail, the often counterintuitive but never causally anomalous or internally inconsistent consequences that emerge from taking the concept seriously (Fleming 1985,1986). In the case of particle and system localization, the concepts are more nearly my own and have been pursued by me for some time (Fleming 1964, 1965, 1966) as a way of freeing the subject of localization in relativistic quantum systems from the conceptual problems pointed out by Newton and Wigner (1949) myself (Fleming 1965) and extensively studied by Hegerfeldt et. al. (1974, 1980) and Ruijsenaars (1981).

Type
Part IV. Physics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1988 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1988 , 1988 , pp. 112 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharonov, Y. and Albert, D. Z. (1980), “States and Observables in Relativistic Quantum Field Theories.” Physical Review, D21: 3316.Google Scholar
Aharonov, Y. and Albert, D. Z. (1981), “Can We Make Sense out of the Measurement Process in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?” Physical Review, D24: 359.Google Scholar
Aharonov, Y. and Albert, D. Z. (1984), “Is the Usual Notion of Time Evolution Adequate for Quantum Mechanical Systems? II. Relativistic considerations.” Physical Review, D29: 228.Google Scholar
Bloch, J. (1967), “Some Relativistic Oddities in the Quantum Theory of Observation.” Physical Review, 156: 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieks, D. (1985), “On the Covariant Description of Wavefunction Collapse.” Physics Letters, 108A: 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. N. (1964), “Covariant Position Operators, Spin and Locality.” Physical Review, 137: B188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. N. (1965), “Nonlocal Properties of Stable Particles.” Physical Review, 139B: 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. N. (1966), “A Manifestly Covariant Description of Dynamical Variables in Relativistic Quantum Theory.” Journal of Mathematical Physics, 7: 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. N. (1985), “Towards a Lorentz Invariant Quantum Theory of Measurement.” (Penn State preprint), unpublished.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. N. (1986), “On a Lorentz invariant quantum theory of Measurement” in New Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory. Greenberger, D. (ed.) New York Academy of Sciences, no. 480.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. N. and Bennett, H. (1989), “Hyperplane Dependence in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics, 19: 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovannini, N. (1983), “Relativistic Kinematics and Dynamics: a New Group Theoretical Approach.” Helvetica Physica Acta, 56: 1002.Google Scholar
Hegerfeldt, G. C. (1974), “Remark on causality and Particle Localization.” Physical Review, D10: 3320.Google Scholar
Hegerfeldt, G. C. and Ruijsenaars, S. N. M. (1980), “Remarks on Causality, Localization, and Spreading of Wave Packets.” Physical Review, D22: 377.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1958), Physics and Philosophy. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1986), “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems”. Physical Review, D34: 470.Google Scholar
Joos, E. and Zeh, H. D. (1985), “The Emergence of Classical Properties Through Interactions with the Environment” Zeitschrift f. Physik, B59: 223.Google Scholar
Ka'rolyha'zy, F., Frenkel, A. and Luka'cs, B. (1986), “On the Possible Role of Gravity in the Reduction of the Wave Function” in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Penrose, R. and Isham, C. (ed.) Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malin, S. (1984), “The Meaning and Significance of Quantum States”, Foundations of Physics, 14, 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, T. D., and Wigner, E. P. (1949), “Localized States for Elementary Systems”. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21: 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearle, P. (1986), “Models for Reduction” in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time R. (ibid.)Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1891), “The Architecture of Theories”. The Monist, 1, 161; reprinted in Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, VI, 6.33 Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (ed.) Harvard University Press (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M. L. G. (1983), “Nonlocality and Peaceful Coexistence”, in Space, Time and Causality, Swinburne, R. (ed.) Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Riezler, K. (1940), “Physics and Reality”. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruijsenaars, S. N. M. (1981), “On Newton-Wigner Localization and Superluminal Propagation Speeds”. Annals of Physics, 137: 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimony, A. (1986), “Events and Processes in the Quantum World”, in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time (ibid.)Google Scholar
Wigner, E. P. (1956), “Relativistic Invariance in Quantum Mechanics”. Nuovo Cimento, III, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. (1983), “Law Without Law”, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H. (ed.) Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurek, W. (1981), “Pointer Basis of Quantum Mechanics; into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse?” Physical Review, D24, 1516.Google Scholar