Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T06:05:48.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Temporality Mind-Dependent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Paul Fitzgerald
Paul Fitzgerald*
Affiliation:
Fordham University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question is oversimple. We are more likely to find the right set of answers if we focus sharply a distinction which is invariably blurred by those who discuss the issue, especially those who argue that “temporal becoming” is a mind-dependent feature of reality. We must distinguish the “indexicality theme” from the “elapsive theme”. Failure to do so has bred some confusion, I think.

A bit of background first. Those who discuss the mind-dependence of temporal becoming think of that issue as analogous to the traditional one about the mind-dependence of secondary qualities. Do colors, felt hotness, and salty taste exist in the mind-independent world? Or only within experience? “Roses are red, just like some of our after-images.” “No they aren't. Roses only have a property of selectively reflecting light in the 7200 Å region. That makes them look red to us. But they aren't really red.” “You're both wrong.

Type
Part X. Time, Causation and Matter
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 282 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Lynn Rudder. (1974-5). “Temporal Becoming: The Argument from Physics.” The Philosophical Forum 6: 218–236.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynn Rudder. (1979). “On the Mind-Dependence of Temporal Becoming.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39: 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R.S. and Schaffner, K.E. ( eds. ). (1974). PSA 1972. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20.) Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Dobbs, H.A.C. (1969). “The ‘Present’ in Physics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19: 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Paul. (1974a). “Nowness and the Understanding of Time.” In Cohen and Schaffner (1974). Pages 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Paul. (1974b). “Critical Study of The Language of Time by Richard M. Gale.” The Philosophical Forum 5: 424–440.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Paul. (1979). “Feature Book Review: Perception by Frank Jackson.” International Philosophical Quarterly 19: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, E. and Sellars, W. ( eds. ). (1971). The Meaning of Time. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard. (1968). The Language of Time. Hew York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf. (1967). Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf. (1969). “Are Physical Events Themselves Transiently Past, Present and Future? A Reply to H.A.C. Dobbs.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf. (1971). “The Meaning of Time.” In Freeman and Sellars (1971). Pages 195–228.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. (1977). Perception: A Representative Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakhnikian, George, ( ed. ). (1974). Bertrand Russell's Philosophy. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. (1956). The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. (1973). Conceptual Idealism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley. (1974). “Memory and Perception in Human Knowledge.” In Nakhnikian (1974). Pages 139–167.Google Scholar
Smart, J.C.C. (1963). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. New York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar