Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T22:26:21.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The IQ Controversy and the Philosophy of Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Kenneth Kaye
Kenneth Kaye*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although my two colleagues on this panel are bona fide philosophers who clearly have a bona fide interest in the ongoing controversy over IQ and the educability of children (which should mean that the topic requires no further defense), I nonetheless feel constrained to say a word in defense of our topic as a viable subject for discussion in a forum devoted to the Philosophy of Science. Perhaps this is because, as the representative of the discipline which created this mess, I fear you might associate me with it. You might feel that bad science is a bad subject for study by philosophers of science, and furthermore that anyone associated with such a discipline would be the last person to have anything intelligent to say about philosophy.

While it is true that we do not need a philosophy of bad science, a kind of Gresham's Law seems sometimes to operate, in which bad science drives out the good.

Type
Symposium: Genetics, IQ and Education
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1974 , 1974 , pp. 181 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, B.: 1974, ‘Time and Learning’, American Psychologist 29, 682-88.10.1037/h0037632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J.: 1975, ‘Five Decades of Public Controversy over Mental Testing,’ American . Psychologists, 1-14.10.1037/0003-066X.30.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, K., Davis, A., Havighurst, R., Herrick, R., and Cronbach, L.: 1951, Intelligence and Cultural Differences; a Study of Cultural Learning and Problem-Solving, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Findley, W. G. and Bryan, M. M.: 1970, Ability Grouping: 1970, University of Georgia, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Jencks, C, Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., and Michelson, S.: 1972, Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R.: 1972, Genetics and Education, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Kaye, K.: 1973a, ‘Some Clarity on Inequality’, School Review 81, 634-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, K..: 1973b, ‘I.Q.: Conceptual Deterrent to Revolution in Education’, Elementary School Journal 74, 9-23.10.1086/460794CrossRefGoogle Scholar