Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:24:51.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Explanatory Tools of Theoretical Population Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Gregory Cooper
Gregory Cooper*
Affiliation:
Potsdam College of the State University of New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is, at present, controversy surrounding the role of the mathematical models which typify the more theoretical portions of ecology and evolutionary biology. Within these sciences there has been controversy about the “testability” of these models, both in terms of the ability of the model to make precise enough claims about the world, and in terms of our ability to determine the values of theoretical parameters. There has been concern, particularly in ecology, about the lack of realism characteristic of most models as well. These are, for the most part, issues involving the nature of theoretical explanation. Much of the current debate about null hypothesis testing, the unfalsifiability of theory, and the role of theory is symptomatic, it would seem, of the fact that these sciences have not settled on what to expect from their most mathematical theories. If there is one emerging theme, it is the need, again especially in ecology, for pluralistic theoretical treatments - which suggests that they may have been expecting too much.

Type
Part III. Biology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 165 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1990

References

Boyd, R. (1973), “Realism, Underdetermination and a Causal Theory of Evidence”, Nous 7: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G. (1988), “Fitness and Explanation”, PSA 1988, Vol.1. Fine, A. and Leplin, J. (eds.). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 207–215.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. (1989), Ecology and Evolution: A Philosophical Study, PhD Dissertation. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. and Case, T. (eds.) (1986), Community Ecology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (1930), The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., and Slatkin, M. (eds.) (1985), Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haila, Y. (1986), “On the Semiotic Dimension of Ecological Theory: The Case of Island Biogeography”, Biology and Philosophy 1: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haila, Y. and Jarvinen, O. (1980), “The Role of Theoretical Concepts in Understanding the Ecological Theatre: A Case Study on Island Biogeography”, in Saarinen (1980).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E. (1961), “The Paradox of the Plankton”, Am. Nat. 95: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. (1974), The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia U. Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. (1985), “Population Genetics”, in Greenwood, et. al. (1985).Google Scholar
Mac Arthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. (1967), The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton U. Press.Google Scholar
Preston, F. W. (1962), “The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rareity: Part I”, Ecology 43: 185–215: Part II, ibid. 43: 410-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, T. (1965), “The Estimation of Fitness from Genotypic Frequencies”, Evolution 19: 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. (1981), “Probability, Explanation, and Information”, Synthese 48: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1983), “Fitness”, The Journal of Philosophy LXXX: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughgarden, J. (1984), “Competition and Theory in Community Ecology”, in Salt (1984).Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J. (1986), “A Comparison of Food Limited and Space Limited Animal Competition Communities”, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
Saarinen, E. (ed.) (1980), Conceptual Issues in Ecology, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (ed.) (1984), Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1983), “Equilibrium Explanation”, Philosophical Studies 43: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, S. (1982), “The Emergence of Evolutionary and Community Ecology as Experimental Sciences”, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1986), “Species Interactions in Fresh Water Fish Communities”, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
Wilson, D.S. (1986), “Adaptive Indirect Effects”, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1980), “Reductionist Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in Saarinen (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar