Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T20:25:19.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Reexamined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka
Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka*
Affiliation:
Nanzan University’, Nagoya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox is an old problem which started back in 1935 with an article in Physical Review titled ‘Does Quantum Mechanics Describe Physical Reality Completely?’ These authors assert that quantum mechanics, being inconsistent, cannot describe physical reality completely. In the present paper the nature of the inconsistency will be analyzed and it will be shown that the E.P.R. paradox is essentially of formal nature and that the apparent formal inconsistency may be regarded as a consequence of unjustifiable presupposition.

According to quantum mechanical theory the states of a microscopic system may be represented by state vectors and in the absence of any disturbance from outside the state vectors will change continuously with time according to Schrodinger's equation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1970 , 1970 , pp. 437 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N., Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bohr, N., Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Margenau, H., Philosophy of Science 25 (1958) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Furry, W. H., Phys. Rev. 49 (1936) 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Wigner, E. P., Am. J. Phys. 31 (1936) 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Bohm, D. and Aharonov, Y., Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Wu, C. S. and Shaknov, I., Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Peres, A. and Singer, P., Nuovo Cimento 15 (1960) 907; Inglis, D. R., Rev. Mod. Phys. 33 (1961) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Sharp, D., Philosophy of Science 28 (1961) 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Araki, H. and Yanase, M., Phys. Rev. 120 (1961) 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar