No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Computerized Implementation of Biomedical Theory Structures: an Artificial Intelligence Approach
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
Extract
At a recent conference I attended involving physicists, biologists, historians, and sociologists, a question about the development of theory in biology in comparison with theory in physics arose, with special interest in the nature of the theorists in the two domains and where they ranked in prestige. The biologists, primarily biochemists, maintained that “theory had a bad name in contemporary biology.” As they saw it from the perspective of biochemists and bench scientists, experimental work was much more highly regarded than theoretical work in biology, in interesting contrast to physics.
Certainly not all biologists are theory averse. In the preface to the first of three volumes edited by C.H. Waddington, the late distinguished geneticist wrote in 1968 that he felt” …that the time is ripe to formulate some skeleton of concepts and methods around which Theoretical Biology can grow….
- Type
- Part II. Biology and Medicine
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1987 by the Philosophy of Science Association
Footnotes
Grateful acknowledgement is made both to the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities for support of my research on theory structure in the biomedical sciences. I also want to thank Professors Harry Pople, Clark Glymour, and Herbert Simon for stimulating discussions about the application of artificial intelligence techniques to knowledge representation in biology and medicine.