Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T11:07:08.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relativity Principle and the Isotropy of Boosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Tim Budden
Tim Budden*
Affiliation:
Oxford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1905 Einstein derived the Lorentz transformations linking inertial coordinate systems. He took as his central principles the relativity principle (RP) and the light postulate (LP), and assumed along the way a symmetry that has become known as ‘spatial isotropy’ (Berzi and Gorini 1969). This symmetry will be defined below but it basically requires that boosting has the same effect whether to the right or left or to the north or south etc. Since it really is a symmetry about boosts I shall call it ‘boost isotropy'.

The purpose of this paper is to explore the relativistic kinematics (both Einsteinian and Galilean) resulting from implementing RP but breaking with the venerable tradition of implementing ‘boost isotropy’.

Type
Part XIII. Spacetime
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1992 , 1992 , pp. 528 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

I wish to thank Jeremy Butterfield for comments on a previous draft, Andrew Hodges for help with the maths and particularly Harvey Brown for lots of help and stimulating discussion. Any errors are my responsibility.

References

Bell, J. (1976), “How to Teach Special Relativity” reprinted in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press 1987, pp.67-80.Google Scholar
Berzi, V. and Gorini, V., (1969), “Reciprocity Principle and the Lorentz Transformations”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10:1518-24.Google Scholar
H.R., Brown (1990), “Does the Principle of Relativity imply Winnie’s (1970) Equal Passage Time Principle?”, Philosophy of Science 57: 313-24.Google Scholar
Brown, H.R. (1992), “Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics in the Emergence of Special Relativity” in Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; a Festschrift for Heinz Post, French, S. and Kamminga, H. (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Budden, T. Brown, H.R., and Hodges, A., (forthcoming), “The Role of Isotropy in the Derivation of Relativistic Kinematics”.Google Scholar
Earman, J., (1974), “Covariance, Invariance and the Equivalence of Frames”, Foundations of Physics 31:267-89Google Scholar
Edwards, W., (1963), “Special Relativity in Anisotropic Space”, American Journal of Physics 31:482-89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1905), “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper”, Annalen der Physik 17 : 891-921. English translation in The Principle of Relativity, Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. (eds.). Dover 1952, pp.37-65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949), “Autobiographical Notes” in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Schilpp, P. (ed.). Illinois: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1983), Foundations of Space-time Theories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, A.I., (1981), Albert Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Pauli, W. (1981), Theory of Relativity. Dover. English translation of Relativitätstheorie (1921).Google Scholar
Rindler, W. (1982), Introduction to Special Relativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Torretti, R. (1983), Relativity and Geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Wald, R. (1984), General Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnie, J., (1970), “Special Relativity Without One Way Velocity Assumptions”, Philosophy of Science 37: 81-99,223-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, E.C. (1964), “Causality Implies te Lorentz Group”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 5, 4: 490-3.Google Scholar