Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:34:10.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Elusive Object of Desire: In Pursuit of the Kinetic Equations and the Second Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Lawrence Sklar*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan

Extract

It is impossible to overrate the important contribution which statistical mechanics makes to our contemporary understanding of the physical world. Cutting across the hierarchy of theories which describe the constitution of things, and related in subtle and not yet fully understood ways to the fundamental dynamical theories, it provides the essential framework for describing the dynamical evolution of systems where large domains of initial conditions lead to a wide variety of possible outcomes distributed in a regular and predictable way. For the special case of the description of systems in equilibrium, the theory provides a systematic formalism which can be applied in any appropriate situation to derive the macroscopic equation of state. Here the usual Gibbsian ensembles, especially microcanonical and canonical, function as a general schematism into which each particular case can be fit. In the more general case of nonequilibrium the situation is less clear.

Type
Part VI. Physics
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, V. and Avez, A. (1968) Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Blatt, J. (1959) “An Alternative Approach to the Ergodic Problem.” Progress of Theoretical Physics 22: 745-755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courbage, M. and Prigogine, I. (1983) “Intrinsic Irreversibility in Classical Dynamical Systems.” Proceedings of ‘the National Academy of Sciences USA 80: 2412-2416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. (1974) The Physics of Time Asymmetry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1987) “The Problem of Irreversibility” this volume.Google Scholar
Grunbaum, A. (1973) Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd. edition. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, E. (1953) “Free Nuclear Induction.” Physics Today 6: 4-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, E. (1965). “Gibbs vs. Boltmann Entropies.” American Journal of Physics 33: 391-398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krylov, N. (1979) Works on the Foundations of Statistical Physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lanford, O. (1976) “On a Derivation of the Boltzmann Equation.” Asterique 40: 117-137. (As reprinted in J. Lebowitz and E. Montroll (eds.), The Boltzmann Equation. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983. Pages 3-17.)Google Scholar
Lebowitz, J. (1983) “Microscopic Dynamics and Macroscopic Laws.” In Horton, C., Reichl, L. and Szebehely, V. (eds.), Long-Time Prediction in Dynamics. New York: Wiley. Pages 3-19.Google Scholar
Omstein, D. (1975) “What Does it Mean for a Mechanical System to be Isomorphic to the Bernoulli Flow.” In Moser, J. (ed.), Dynamical Systems, Theory and Application. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Pages 209-233.Google Scholar
Penrose, O. (1979) “Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.” Reports on Progress in Physics Vol. 42, pages 1937-2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1979) “Singularities and Time Asymmetry.” General Relativity. Edited by Hawking, S. and Israel, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 581-638.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956) The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhim, W., Pines, A., and Waugh, J. (1971) “Time-Reversal Experiments in Dipolar Coupled Spin Systems.” Physical Review B 3: 684-695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar