Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T01:26:12.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elementarily and Anti-Matter in Contemporary Physics: Comments on Michael D. Resnik’s “Between Mathematics and Physics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Susan C. Hale*
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part IX. Mathematical and Physical Objects
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Michael D. Resnik, Mark Risjord, and Richard Zaffron for their helpful comments while I was initially preparing this commentary. Many participants at the PSA meeting raised good criticisms, but I would especially to thank Steven French and Hartry Field for their criticisms.

References

Boscovich, R.J. (1966), A Theory of Natural Philosophy, translated by Child, J.M.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1987), “Max Born and the Reality of Quantum Probabilities”, in The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. II, Kruger, L., Gigerenzer, G., and Morgan, M. (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gjertsen, D. (1989), Science and Philosophy: Past and present. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1983), Encounters with Einstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, M.D. (1991), “Between Mathematics and Physics” this volume.Google Scholar