No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Part IX. Marjorie Grene's Contributions to Philosophy of Science
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Asquith, P.D and Kitcher, P (eds.). (1985). PSA 1984. Volume 3. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco (1968). “Biology as an Autonomous Science.” American Scientist 56: 207-221.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1982). “What's in a Word? Coming to Terms with the Darwinian Revolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 15: 215-239.Google Scholar
Brandon, R.N (1981). “A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory.” In PSA 1980 Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D and Giere, R.N. East Lansing: Philosophy, of Science Association. Pages 427-439.Google Scholar
Brandon, R.N (1985). “Grene on Mechanism and Reductionism: More Than Just a Side Issue.” In Asquith and Kitcher (1985). Pages 345-353.Google Scholar
Brown, Harold I (1979). Perception. Theory and Commitment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard (1983). “Adaptation.” In Dimensions of Darwinism. Edited by Grene, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 287-314.Google Scholar
Burian, Richar (1985). “Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene.” In Depew and Weber (1985). Pages 21-42.Google Scholar
Compton, John J (1985). “Marjorie Grene and The Phenomenon of Life,” In Asquith and Kitcher (1985). Pages 354-364.Google Scholar
Depew, Davi and Heber, Bruc, (eds.). (1985). Evolution At A Crossroads: The Hew Biology and the New Philosophy of Science: Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1978). Explanatory Struotures: A Study of the Concepts of Explanation in Early Physios and Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Ja and Lewontin, Richard C (1978). “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” In Proceedings of the Royfl1 Society of London B 205: 581-598.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Ja (1983). “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.” In Dimensions of Darwinism. Edited by Grene, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 71-93.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1971). “Reducibility: Another Side Issue.” In Interpretations of Life and Mind. Edited by Marjorie Grene., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; New York: Humanities Press. Pages 14-37. (As reprinted in Grene (1974b). Pages 53-73.)Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1972). “Aristotle and Modern Biology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 33: 395-124. (As reprinted in Grene (1974b). Pages 74-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1974a). “Explanation and Evolution.” In Grene (1974b). Pages 207-227.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1974b). The understanding of Nature. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XXIII.) (eds.) Cohen, Robert S and Wartofsky, Marx H. Dordrecht: Beidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom (1970). Principles of Scientific Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, M.J.S (1983). “The Development of Darwin's General Biological Theorizing.” In Evolution from Molecules to Men. Edited, by D.S. Bendall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 43-62.Google Scholar
Hull, David L (1983). “Darwin and the Nature of Science.” In Evolution from Molecules to Men. Edited by D.S. Bendall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 63-80.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1982). “Genes.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 337-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, L.A (1984). “Substance, Being and Energeia.” In Oxford Studies in Greek Philosophy. Edited by Annas, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, James G (1985). “Marjorie Grene, Aristotle's Philosophy of Science and Aristotle's Biology.” In Asquith and Kitcher (1985). Pages 365-377.Google Scholar
Levins, Richar and Lewontln, Richard C (1980). “Dialectics and Reductionism in Ecology.” Synthese 43: 107-138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richarde (1978). “Adaptation.” Scientific American 229(3): 156-169. (As reprinted in Sober (1984). Pages 234-251.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad (1963). Das Sogenannte Böse. Wien: Borotha-Schoel er Verlag. (As reprinted as On Aggression, (trans.) M.K. Wilson. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, (1978). “Optimization Theory in Evolution.” Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 9: 31-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1974). “Teleological and Teleonomlc, A New Analysis,” In Methodological and Historical, Eflgavs in the Natural and Soölal Sciences. (Boston Studies In the Philosophy of Science. Volume XIV.) Edited by Cohen, R and Hartofsky, M. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 91-117.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1983). “How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program.” American Naturalist 121: 324-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, Jacques (1970). Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. (As reprinted as Chance and Necessity, (trans.) A. Wainhouse. New York: Vintage Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1984). “Positive Science and Discoverability.”In PSA 1984, Volume 1. Edited by Asquith, P.D and Kitcher, P. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 13-27.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierr. (1982). La Classification des Animaux chez Aristote. Paris:Société d'Édition “des Belles Lettres”.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1968). “Life's Irreducible Structure.” Science 160: 1308-1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1984). Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Thoday, J.M (1953). “Components of Fitness.” Symposium of the Society for the Study of Experimental Biology 7: 96-113.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1980). “Reductionistio Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy.” In Scientific Discovery, Case Studies. (Boston Studies In the Philosophy of Science, Volume 60.) Edited by Nickles, T. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 213-259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar