Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:04:57.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wikipedia and Political Science: Addressing Systematic Biases with Student Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Brooke A. Ackerly Open the ORCID record for Brooke A. Ackerly [Opens in a new window]  and
Kristin Michelitch Open the ORCID record for Kristin Michelitch [Opens in a new window]
Brooke A. Ackerly
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, USA
Kristin Michelitch
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Wikipedia and Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 429 - 433
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltz, Samuel. 2022. “Reducing Bias in Wikipedia’s Coverage of Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics, doi:10.1017/S1049096521001207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbee, James, Larson, Jennifer, and Munger, Kevin. 2020. “#polisci Twitter: A Descriptive Analysis of How Political Scientists Use Twitter in 2019.” Perspectives on Politics 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720003643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Adam. 2011. “Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 339–43.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1969. “The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 63 (4): 1051–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Shane, and Zhu, Feng. 2012. “Is Wikipedia Biased?” American Economic Review 102 (3): 343–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Shane, and Zhu, Feng. 2018. “Do Experts or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia.” MIS Quarterly 42 (3): 945–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, George D. 2008. “High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter.” Report of the Association of American Colleges & Universities 14 (3): 28–29.Google Scholar
Mesgari, Mostafa, Okoli, Chitu, Mehdi, Mohamad, Nielsen, Finn Årup, and Lanamäki, Arto. 2015. “The Sum of All Human Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Scholarly Research on the Content of Wikipedia.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (2): 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norell, Elizabeth. 2022. “Civic Engagement Meets Service Learning: Improving Wikipedia’s Coverage of State Government Officials.” PS: Political Science & Politics, doi:10.1017/S1049096521001451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, Anasuya and Ackerly, Brooke. 2022. “Wikipedia Edit-A-Thons: Sites of Struggle, Resistance, and Responsibility.” PS: Political Science & Politics, doi:10.1017/S1049096521001220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 433–47.Google Scholar
Wilfahrt, Martha and Michelitch, Kristin. 2022. “Improving Open-Source Information on African Politics, One Student at a Time.” PS: Political Science & Politics, doi:10.1017/S1049096521001219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar