Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:29:20.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why It Is Difficult to Teach Comparative Politics to American Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert Cox
Robert Cox*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 68 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1993

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank Mark Brandon, Gary Copeland, and Luz-Eugenia Köeck-Fuenzalida for their comments on an earlier draft of this article.

References

Almond, Gabriel. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 21(4): 828–42.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott, and Beck, Paul, eds. 1984. Electoral Change: Realignment and Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamant, Alfred. 1990. “Comparative Politics: The Myth of the Eternal Return.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 23(4): 598–600.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1987. “Political Change: Central America, South America, and the Caribbean.” In Weiner, Myron and Huntington, Samuel P., eds., Understanding Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold, Heclo, Hugh, and Adams, Carolyn Teich. 1990. Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in America, Europe, and Japan, 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard, and Patterson, Samuel C. 1979. Comparing Legislatures. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1991. “The Politics of the Republican Era—and the Future of the Republic.” Julian J. Rothbaum Distinuished Lecture in Representative Government, The Carl Albert Center, Norman, Oklahoma, 24 October.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Nice, David C. 1987. Federalism: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Glenda M. 1984. “Political Culture.” In Sartori, Giovanni, ed., Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Riggs, Fred W. 1991. “Public Administration: A Comparativist Framework.” Public Administration Review, Nov./Dec. 51(6): 473–77.10.2307/976597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1989. “How Exceptional Is the American Political Economy?” Political Studies Quarterly 104(1): 91–211.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1991. “Comparing and Miscomparing.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3): 243–57.10.1177/0951692891003003001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1991. “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.” American Political Science Review, 85(4): 1239–60.10.2307/1963944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. “Doing More and Using Less: Utilisation of Research as a Result of Regime.” In Comparative Policy Research: Learning from Experience, eds. Dierkes, Meinolf, Weiler, Hans N. and Antal, Arianne Bertoin. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar