Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:23:18.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Voting Rights Act: Disfranchisement, Dilution, and Alternative Election Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Richard L. Engstrom
Richard L. Engstrom*
Affiliation:
University of New Orleans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Voting Rights Act (VRA) (79 Stat. 667) is widely regarded as the most effective piece of civil rights legislation enacted in the United States. Adopted initially in 1965 to protect the voting rights of African Americans, it was expanded in 1975 to protect the voting rights of specified language minorities: Hispanice, Native Americans, Native Alaskans, and Asian Americans.

A number of important changes in American politics can be traced directly to the VRA. The first is the dramatic increase in the number of minority voters. The major barriers to minority group members registering to vote and casting ballots have been removed as a result of the Act; consequently, minority disfranchisement is only rarely an issue today.

The expansion of the minority electorate was critical to another important change, the increase in the number of minority elected officials. Minority voter support has usually been essential to the electoral success of minority candidates. Growth in the minority electorate in the United States was followed by an increase in minority officeholders. The magnitude of this increase, however, has been dependent on additional VRA provisions.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 685 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James E. 1994. “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black and White Voter Registration in the South.” In Quiet Revolution in the South, ed. Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Derfner, Armand. 1981. “The Implications of the City of Mobile Case for Extension of the Voting Rights Act.” In The Right to Vote. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Richard L. 1992. “Modified Multi-Seat Election Systems as Remedies for Minority Vote Dilution.” Stetson Law Review 21:743–70.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Richard L., Still, Edward, and Kirksey, Jason F. Forthcoming. “Limited and Cumulative Voting in Alabama.” National Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Garrow, David J. 1978. Protest at Selma. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Davidson, Chandler. 1994. “The Effect of Municipal Election Structure on Black Representation in Eight Southern States.” In Quiet Revolution in the South, ed. Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Handley, Lisa, and Grofman, Bernard. 1994. “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Minority Representation.” In Quiet Revolution in the South. Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard, eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. 1993. National Roster of Black Elected Officials: 1993. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.Google Scholar
NALEO Education Fund. 1993. 1993 National Roster of Hispanic Elected Officials. Washington, DC: NALEO Education Fund.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1993. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1992. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 1968. Political Participation. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar