Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T14:12:39.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voter-Identification Requirements and the Learning Curve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Timothy Vercellotti  and
David Andersen
Timothy Vercellotti
Affiliation:
Western New England College
David Andersen
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Debates over whether to require voters to provide proof of identity at the polls, and just how that can be accomplished, are taking place in legislative chambers and courtrooms across the nation. At the heart of these debates is the balancing act of ballot security versus access to voting. Opponents of voter-identification requirements argue that they place a disproportionate burden on ethnic and racial minorities, the poor, the less educated, the very young, and the very old. Supporters of identification requirements argue the standards are no higher than those required for boarding a plane or cashing a check, and the requirements are needed to prevent voter fraud.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 117 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2002. California Votes: The Promise of Election Day Registration. New York: Demos. http://archive.demos.org/pubs/california_votes.pdf.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Bailey, Delia, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2008. “The Effect of Voter Identification Laws on Turnout.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Nagler, Jonathan, and Wilson, Catherine H.. 2004. Making Voting Easier: Election Day Registration in New York. New York: Demos. http://www.tcf.org/Publications/ElectionReform/EDR_Demos.pdf.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt A., Nuño, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. 2007. “The Disproportionate Impact of Indiana Voter ID Requirements on the Electorate.” Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity and Race, November. http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/documents/Indiana_voter.pdf.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt A., Nuño, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. 2008. “The Disproportionate Impact of Indiana Voter ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Eagleton Institute of Politics, and Moritz College of Law. 2006. “Report to the U. S. Election Assistance Commission on Best Practices to Improve Voter Identification Requirements.” Rutgers University and The Ohio State University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Glenn E., and Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Impact of Legal Constraints on Voter Registration, Turnout, and the Composition of the American Electorate.” Political Behavior 17: 179–202.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jason. 2001. “Geographical Mobility, March 1999 to March 2000.” U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p20-538.pdf.Google Scholar
Vercellotti, Timothy, and Andersen, David. 2006. “Protecting the Franchise, or Restricting it? The Effects of Voter Identification Requirements on Turnout.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar