Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-19T00:53:03.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voter-ID Issues in Politics and PoliticalScience

Editor's Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Richard Sobel
Richard Sobel
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The simple act of voting—and its barriers, costs, benefits, andmobilization—continues to be central to politics and politicalscience (Kelley and Mirer 1974). The Supreme Court case Crawford vs.Marion County Election Board (2008) and a well-attendedpanel on the topic at the 2008 APSA annual meeting in Bostonhighlight the pertinence of voter-ID issues to the polity anddiscipline for the 2008 and future elections. As simple as votingis, it is also “of the most fundamental significance under ourconstitutional structure” (Burdick v. Takushi1992).

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 81 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albano, Jonathan, Timothy H. Madden, Jennifer Banting MikoLevine, Jason Lane, and Bingham McCutchen LLP. 2007. “Brief of Amici Curiae Cyber Policy Project, Privacy Journal, Privacy Activism, Liberty Coalition, U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation, Robbin Stewart and Joell Palmer in Support of Petitioners.” Amicus Brief for the Plaintiffs in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. 553 U.S. (2008). http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/Rokita-BriefamicuscuriaeofCyberPrivacy.pdf.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2009. “Effects of Voter-Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence from the Experiences of Voters on Election Day.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 127–30.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt, Nuño, Stephen, and Sanchez, Gabriel. 2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 111–16.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Martin H. 2007. “Real ID Revolt Spreads to 33 States.” ConsumerAffairs.com, May 9.Google Scholar
Burdick v. Takushi. 1992. 504 U.S. 428.Google Scholar
Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2007. 472 F.3d 949. 7th Cir.Google Scholar
Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2008. 553 U.S.Google Scholar
Davidson, Chandler. 2009. “The Historical Context of Voter Photo-ID Laws.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 93–96.Google Scholar
Drew, Christopher. 2007. “Lower Voter Turnout Is Seen in States that Require ID.” New York Times, February 21. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/us/21voting.html.Google Scholar
Eggen, Dan. 2005. “Criticism of Voting Law Was Overruled, Justice Dept. Backed Georgia Measure Despite Fears of Discrimination.” Washington Post, November 17, A01.Google Scholar
Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith. 1990. 494 U.S. 872.Google Scholar
Groth, William R. 2009. “Litigating the Indiana Photo-ID Law: Lessons in Judicial Dissonance and Abdication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 97–101.Google Scholar
Hershey, Marjorie. 2009. “What We Know about Voter-ID Laws, Registration, and Turnout.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 87–91.Google Scholar
Iglesias, David. 2008. In Justice. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., and Mirer, T.W.. 1974. “The Simple Act of Voting.” American Political Science Review 68 (June): 574.Google Scholar
Lipton, Eric, and Urbina, Ian. 2007. “In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud.” New York Times, April 12. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html.Google Scholar
Mycoff, Jason D., Wagner, Michael W., and Wilson, David C.. 2009. “The Empirical Effects of Voter-ID Laws: Present or Absent?” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 121–26.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2008. “Editorial—The Acorn Story.” October 17, A32.Google Scholar
Orenstein, Aviva. 2008. “Exclusion of Eligible Voters Raises Concerns for Our Hoosier Democracy.” Herald Times, October 16.Google Scholar
Rushing, J. Taylor. 2008. “Lamar Seeing Chance to Nix Real ID Act.” Hill.com, March 25.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert Ellis, and Sobel, Richard. 2009. “Demands for Voter Identification Require a Constitutional Standard: Reasonable Suspicion of Fraudulent Activity.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 103–05.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert Ellis, and Sobel, Richard. 2002. “The Demeaning of Identity and Personhood in National Identification Systems.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 15: 319.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard. 2008. “Citizenship as Foundation.” TriQuarterly (Winter): 237–63.Google Scholar
Sobel, Robert, and Smith, Robert Ellis. 2009. “Voter-ID Laws Discourage Participation, Particular among Minorities, and Trigger a Little-Known Constitutional Remedy in Lost Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 107–10.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard, and Fennel, John. 2007. “Troubles with Hiibel: How the Court Inverted the Relationship between Citizens and the State.” S. Texas Law Review 48 (3): 613–43.Google Scholar
Vercellotti, Timothy, and Anderson, David. 2009. “Voter-Identification Requirements and the Learning Curve.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 117–20.Google Scholar