Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:00:41.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“United in Diversity”: Research Ethics in European Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Daniela R. Piccio
Daniela R. Piccio*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Discipline of Political Science in Europe: How Different Is It from Political Science in North America?
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 839 - 844
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Colnerud, Gunnel. 2015. “Ethical Dilemmas in Research in Relation to Ethical Review: An Empirical Study.” Research Ethics 10 (4): 238–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dench, Sally, Iphofen, Ron, and Huws, Ursula. 2013. An EU Code of Ethics for Socio-Economic Research. Brighton: The Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert. 2008. “The Ethical Case Against Ethical Regulation in Humanities and Social Science Research.” Twenty-First Century Society 3 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert. 2012. “How Did We Ever Get Into This Mess? The Rise of Ethical Regulation in the Social Sciences.” In Love, Kevin (ed.) Ethics in Social Research (Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Volume 12). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 3–26.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. and Petty, JuLeigh. 2010. “Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 601–26.Google Scholar
Resnik, David B., Rasmussen, Lisa M., and Kissling, Grace E.. 2015. “An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies.” Account Res. 22 (5): 249–266.Google Scholar
Gurzawska, Agata and Benčin, Rok. 2015. “Ethics Assessment in Different Fields: Social Sciences.” Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Institutions in the EU and selected other countries - Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation - SATORI project (FP7/2007-2013).Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn. 2010. “Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research.” Sociological Research Online 15 (4): 16.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin D. 2004. “Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics.” Qualitative Sociology 27 (4): 391–414.Google Scholar
Godecharle, Simon, Nemery, Ben, Dierickx, Kris. 2013. “Guidance on Research Integrity: No Union in Europe.” The Lancet 381 (March): 1097–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Mark. 2014. Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Jennings, Seam. 2012. “Response to Schrag: What are Ethics Committees for Anyway? A Defence of Social Science Research Ethics Review.” Research Ethics 8 (2): 87–96.Google Scholar
Kamalski, Judith and Plume, Andrew. 2013. “Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research Collaboration and Researcher Mobility.” Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, Ragnvald. 2015. “Plagiarism as Violation of Law in Norway: On Inappropriate Juridification of Research Ethics.” In Integrity in the Global Research Arena, eds. Steneck, Nicholas H., Anderson, Melissa, Kleinert, Sabine, and Mayer, Tony. Hackensack, London: World Scientific Publishing, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). 2006. Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Law and the Humanities. Oslo: De Nasjonale Forskningsetiske Komiteer.Google Scholar
NordForsk. 2015. Research Integrity in the Nordic Countries – National Systems and Procedures. Oslo: Nordforsk.Google Scholar
Schrag, Zachary M. 2009. “How Talking Became Human Subjects Research: The Federal Regulation of the Social Sciences: 1965-1991.” The Journal of Policy History 21: 3–37.Google Scholar
Schrag, Zachary M. 2011. “The Case Against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences.” Research Ethics 7 (4): 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, Anthea and Coomber, Vera. 2004. University Research Ethics Committees: Their Role, Remit and Conduct. London: King’s College London.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 1

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 396.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 2

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 106.4 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 3

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.2 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 4

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 111.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 5

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 91.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 6

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 78.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Piccio supplementary material

Piccio supplementary material 7

Download Piccio supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 237.4 KB

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata