Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:35:25.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Un(COIL)ing the Pandemic: Active and Affective Learning in Times of COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2021

Violeta Cotoman ,
Annabel Davies ,
Nanako Kawagoe ,
Hana Niihashi ,
Aisha Rahman ,
Yuki Tomita Open the ORCID record for Yuki Tomita [Opens in a new window] ,
Atsuko Watanabe Open the ORCID record for Atsuko Watanabe [Opens in a new window]  and
Felix Rösch Open the ORCID record for Felix Rösch [Opens in a new window]
Violeta Cotoman
Affiliation:
Coventry University, United Kingdom
Annabel Davies
Affiliation:
Coventry University, United Kingdom
Nanako Kawagoe
Affiliation:
Hosei University, Japan
Hana Niihashi
Affiliation:
Hosei University, Japan
Aisha Rahman
Affiliation:
Coventry University, United Kingdom
Yuki Tomita
Affiliation:
Hosei University, Japan
Atsuko Watanabe
Affiliation:
Kanazawa University, Japan
Felix Rösch
Affiliation:
Coventry University, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global effect on higher education. Overnight, entire degree programs had to be moved online. Whereas this meant that teaching and learning in political science and international relations also went into “emergency e-learning” mode, as a recent teacher spotlight in PS: Political Science & Politics termed it, moving online also offered opportunities. One opportunity is collaborative online international learning (COIL) that enables students from universities in different countries to work on a common project. This article argues that working together collaboratively online not only mitigates the pandemic’s physical restrictions and sustains a global space of learning; it also provides for a particular active and affective learning in an intercultural virtual environment that substantiates classroom experiences even in post-pandemic higher education. To support this argument, this article reflects on the experiences of a British–Japanese COIL project that investigated political responses to COVID-19.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 188 - 192
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ba, Oumar. 2021. “When Teaching Is Impossible: A Pandemic Pedagogy of Care.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 171–72.Google Scholar
Becker, Manuel, Leßke, Felix, Liedtke, Enrico, Hausteiner, Eva, Heidbrink, Christiane, Horneber, Jakob, Huyeng, Tim, Minasyan, Shushanik, Ohnesorge, Hendrik W., Raths, Maximilian, and Wessel, Penelope. 2020. “Rückblick auf das erste ‘Corona-Semester.’ Ergebnisse einer semesterbegleitenden Untersuchung der Task Force Digitale Lehre des Instituts für Politische Wissenschaft und Soziologie der Universität Bonn.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 30 (4): 681–96.10.1007/s41358-020-00243-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. 2008. “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.” Review of International Studies 34 (S1): 115–35.10.1017/S0260210508007821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esarey, Justin, and Wood, Andrew R.. 2018. “Blogs, Online Seminars, and Social Media as Tools of Scholarship in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 811–19.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard W., and Genauer, Jessica. 2019. “A Classroom Simulation of the Syrian Conflict.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 737–42.Google Scholar
Gifkins, Jess. 2015. “What Is ‘Active Learning’ and Why Is It Important?” E-International Relations. https://bit.ly/381iGZt.Google Scholar
Harkness, Kristen A., and DeVore, Marc R.. 2021. “Teaching the Military and Revolutions: Simulating Civil–Military Relations during Mass Uprisings.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 315–20.Google Scholar
Holland, Jack. 2016. “Visual Literacy in International Relations: Teaching Critical Evaluative Skills through Fictional Television.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (2): 173–86.Google Scholar
Holland, Martin, Sliwinski, Krzysztof, and Thomas, Nicholas. 2021. “Is Affective Effective? Measuring Affective Learning in Simulations.” International Studies Perspectives 22 (3): 261–82.10.1093/isp/ekaa005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laura, Rubin, Olivier, and Schouenborg, Laust. 2016. “Undead Pedagogy: How a Zombie Simulation Can Contribute to Teaching International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (2): 187–201.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Emma. 2021. “Toward an Ethic of Care and Inclusivity in Emergency E-Learning.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 185–87.Google Scholar
Johns Hopkins University. 2021. “COVID-19 Dashboard.” Baltimore, MD: Center for Systems Science and Engineering. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.Google Scholar
Kaempf, Sebastian, and Finn, Carrie. 2021. “Teaching International Relations through the Format of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC).” International Studies Perspectives 22 (1): 1–24.10.1093/isp/ekz025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, Steven L. 2007. “Challenging Hegemonic Paradigms and Practices: Critical Thinking and Active Learning Strategies for International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (1): 112–16.Google Scholar
Loepp, Eric D. 2021. “COVID-19 and Emergency e-Learning in Political Science and International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 169–71.Google Scholar
Martel, Stéphanie, Rourke, Serena, Wade, Sydney, and Watters, Munro. 2021. “Simulating ‘Normalcy’ in a Global Pandemic: Synchronous e-Learning and the Ethics of Care in Teaching.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 173–75.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, Elizabeth, and Tutunji, Tarek. 2018. “Teaching Critical Understandings of Realism through Historical War Simulations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (2): 440–44.Google Scholar
Rösch, Felix. 2018. “The Power of Dance: Teaching International Relations through Contact Improvisation.” International Studies Perspectives 19 (1): 67–82.10.1093/isp/ekx002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, Jerald, and Olive, Andrea. 2018. “Slack: Adopting Social-Networking Platforms for Active Learning.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (1): 183–89.Google Scholar
Shaw, Carolyn M. 2020. “The Unexpected Gift: ‘Oh, and You’ll Be Responsible for the Model UN Program.’” In Pedagogical Journeys through World Politics, ed. Frueh, Jamie, 243–52. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-20305-4_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2017. “Recognising, and Realising, the Promise of the Aesthetic Turn.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45 (2): 206–13.10.1177/0305829816684254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2021. “When Good Enough Is Good Enough: Department Chairing during COVID-19.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 187–88.Google Scholar
Villar-Onrubia, Daniel, and Rajpal, Brinder. 2016. “Online International Learning: Internationalizing the Curriculum through Virtual Mobility at Coventry University.” Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 20 (2–3): 75–82.Google Scholar
Wimpenny, Katherine, and Orsini-Jones, Marina. 2020. “Innovation in Collaborative Online International Learning: A Holistic Blend.” In Radical Solutions and e-Learning: Practical Innovations and Online Educational Technology, ed. Burgos, Daniel, 1–25. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar