Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:49:50.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Ways to Political Science: Critical and Descriptive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

H. Mark Roelofs
H. Mark Roelofs*
Affiliation:
New York University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 264 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1994

Footnotes

*

The allusion is to Aquinas's assertion (1924, 4–15) that there are two ways to divine truth.

References

Bellah, Robert. 1967. “Civil Religion in America,” DAEDALUS, Winter 96:1–21.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 1992. The Broken Covenant. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur Fisher. 1908. The Process of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1991. Modern Political Analysis. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1971. The Political System. 2nd ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Finifter, Ada. 1993. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. 2nd ed. Washington: APSA.Google Scholar
Hargrove, Erwin, and Nelson, Michael. 1984. Presidents, Politics, and Policy, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kenneth. 1992. The Elements of Social Scientific Thinking. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kenneth. 1994. Ideology and Political Life. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1963. “Political Science and Political Education,” American Political Science Review, 57:561–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1947. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, N.K.. New York: St. Martin's Press Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1947. The Moral Law. Trans. Paton, H.J.. London: Hutchinson's.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. 1988. The Spirit of Modem Republicanism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Plato. 1941. The Republic. Trans. F.M. Cornford. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roelofs, H. Mark. 1992a. “The Prophetic President: Charisma in the American Political Tradition,” Polity, Fall 25:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, H. Mark. 1992b. The Poverty of American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Roelofs, H. Mark. Forthcoming. “The nth Amendment.”Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomonology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, Richard. 1992. The Foundations of American Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Susser, Bernard. 1992. Approaches to the Study of Politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1924. Summa Contra Gentiles. Vol. 1. Trans. Fathers, Dominican, London: Burns et al.Google Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1963. The Frontier in American History. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Walter, Oliver. 1971. Political Scientists at Work. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1969. Basic Concepts in Sociology. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar