No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transgender Bodies are the Battleground: Backlash, Threat, and the Future of Queer Rights in the United States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2025
Abstract
Legislation that seeks to restrict the ability of transgender people to fully participate in society has proliferated across state legislatures in the last four years. In legislative sessions throughout the United States, legislators have argued in favor of denying transgender people access to public facilities, sports, health care, and even their own guardians. What can these debates tell us not only about the backlash against transgender people but the queer community and women more broadly? Using an analysis of the debate on anti-transgender legislation in two state legislatures, we argue that legislators attempt to gain support for anti-transgender legislation using paternal, protectionist frames and by coopting the language of feminism. We argue that the gender essentialism and heteronormativity at the center of these debates indicates an attempt on behalf of conservative movements and legislators to pursue an idealized, heteropatriarchal society with a strict gender binary.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Ayoub, Phillip, and Stoeckl, Kristina. 2024. “The Double-helix Entanglements of Transnational Advocacy: Moral Conservative Resistance to LGBTI Rights.” Review of International Studies 50 (2): 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Andrea J. 2023. “From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Lisa. 2023. If We Were Kin: Race, Identification, and Intimate Political Appeals. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccia, Rossella, and Roggeband, Conny. 2021. “Unpacking Intersectional Solidarity: Dimensions of Power in Coalitions.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 4 (2): 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMillo, Andrew. 2023. “Judge Rules Arkansas Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Minors Violates US Constitution.” June 20. AP News. https://apnews.com/us-news/arkansas-gender-general-news-2a0d032f4e4f3195c180d879239e6521.Google Scholar
Druckman, James, and Sharrow, Elizabeth. 2023. Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX’s Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2003. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity?’” In Questions of Cultural Identity, Hall, S. Stuart, and Gay, Paul D., ed. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 1994. “Policy Studies within a Feminist Frame.” Policy Studies 27:97–118.Google Scholar
Hatewatch. 2021. “Far-Right Groups Flood State Legislatures with Anti-Trans Bills Targeting Children.” Southern Poverty Law Center, April 26. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2021/04/26/far-right-groups-flood-state-legislatures-anti-trans-bills-targeting-children.Google Scholar
Jones, Phillip E., Brewer, Paul R., Young, Dannagal G., Lambe, Jennifer L., and Hoffman, Lindsay H.. 2018. “Explaining Public Opinion Toward Transgender People, Rights, and Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (2): 252–78.Google Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca. 2015. “Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (1): 41–66.Google Scholar
Lusvardi, Amber. 2024. “‘Sorry That Happened to You’: Testifying, Trauma, and the Politics of Child Marriage in the United States.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy 46 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Mallory, Christy, and Redfield, Elana. 2023. “The Impact of 2023 Legislation on Transgender Youth.” UCLA School of Law Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/2023-trans-legislative-summary/.Google Scholar
Murib, Zein. 2020. “Administering Biology: How ‘Bathroom Bills’ Criminalize and Stigmatize Trans and Gender Nonconforming People in Public Space.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 42 (2): 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murib, Zein. 2022. “Don’t Read the Comments: Examining Social Media Discourse on Trans Athletes.” Laws 11 (4): 53.Google Scholar
Murib, Zein. 2023. Terms of Exclusion: Rightful Citizenship Claims and the Construction of LGBT Political Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas. 2013. “Issue Framing.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, ed. Shapiro, Robert Y. and Jacobs, Lawrence R., 189–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, Madison. 2023. “Inside the Secret Working Group That Helped Push Anti-Transgender Laws across the Country.” Mother Jones, March 8.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Marc. 2024. “As Anti-trans Legislation Proliferates in 2024, Community Fears Erasure from Public View.” USA Today, February 6.Google Scholar
Roberti, Amanda. 2022. “Empowering Women by Regulating Abortion? Conservative Women Lawmakers’ Cooptation of Feminist Language in US Abortion Politics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 10 (1): 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saric, Ivana. 2024. “What Project 2025 could Mean for LGBTQ+ Americans.” Axios, November 7. https://www.axios.com/2024/11/07/project-2025-lgbtq-rights.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2017. “Anti-Feminist, Pro-Life, and Anti-ERA Women.” In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Women’s Social Movement Activism, ed. McCammon, Holly J., Taylor, Verta, Reger, Jo, and Einwohner, Rachel L., 315–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilt, Kristen, and Westbrook, Laurel. 2015. “Bathroom Battlegrounds and Penis Panics.” Contexts 14 (3): 26–31.Google Scholar
Sharrow, Elizabeth. 2021. “Sports, Transgender Rights, and the Bodily Politics of Transgender Identity.” Laws 10 (3): 63.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 2022. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stryker, Susan. 2008. “Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity.” Radical History Review 100: 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadlock, Barry. 2017. “Issue Framing and Transgender Politics: An Examination of Interest Group Websites and Media Coverage.” In Transgender Rights and Politics: Groups, Issue Framing, and Policy Adoption, ed. Taylor, Jami and Haider-Markel, Donald, 25–48. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Trans Legislation Tracker. 2024. “Anti-Trans Bill Tracker.” https://translegislation.com/.Google Scholar
Wineinger, Catherine. 2022. Gendering the GOP: Intraparty Politics and Republican Women’s Representation in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael, 1–33. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Wuest, Joanna, and Last, Briana. 2024. “Agents of Scientific Uncertainty: Conflicts over Evidence and Expertise in Gender-affirming Care Bans for Minors.” Social Science & Medicine 344:article 116533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Design and Research Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.Google Scholar
Kelly-Thompson and Lusvardi supplementary material
Kelly-Thompson and Lusvardi supplementary material
File
40.4 KB