Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:01:16.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theorizing Citizenship and Evaluating Public Achievement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

R.W. Hildreth
R.W. Hildreth*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Researcher (R): How has doing Public Achievement (PA) changed the way you think about yourself?

Casey (pseudonym for an elementary school student): I am less lonely now that I have done Public Achievement.

R: Really, that's interesting, what is it in PA makes you less lonely?

Casey: Well, people used to think that I am kinda weird here, and I am different. I like playing in the woods and stuff by myself and doing my own kind of stuff.

R: And people think of you as less weird when you do PA?

Casey: Yeah, they even give awards to kids like me in PA.

R: Wow! It sounds like you are a leader in PA.

Casey: Yeah, I really like doing PA.

R: Let me see if I am hearing you right, before PA people thought that you were weird, and now that you have done PA, people look at you differently?

Casey: Yeah.

R: How do you think they look at you differently now?

Casey: They look at me as a citizen.

R: As a citizen, what does it mean for them to look at you as a citizen?

Casey: Like I am more of an equal, they listen to what I have to say.

This dialogue, filled with civic promise, is typical of the many conversations I have had with young participants in reflecting upon their experiences in Public Achievement.

Type
Service Learning in Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 627 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry, and Farr, James. 1997. “The Work of Citizenship and the Problem of Service Learning.” In Educating Citizenship: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Political Science, ed. Battistoni, Richard M and Hudson, William E.. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry, and James Farr, and Kari, Nancy. 1996. Building America: The Democratic Promise of Public Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Sara, and Boyte, Harry. 1986. Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Farr, James. 1997. “Political Theory.” In Educating Citizenship: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Political Science, ed. Battistoni, Richard M and Hudson, William E.. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hertneneutics, ed. Dreyfus, Herbert and Rabinaw, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hildreth, R.W. 1998. Building Worlds, Transforming Lives, Making History: A Guide to Public Achievement. Minneapolis: Center for Democracy and Citizenship, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Jianas, Linda, Hellmer, Tricia, and Jones, Robin. 1999. Public Achievement—Citizenship in the Heartland: Year Two Evaluation. Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauifmann Foundation.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alasdair. 1983. “The Indispensability of Political Theory.” In The Nature of Political Theory, ed. Miller, David and Siedentop, Larry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mint, S.D., and Hesser, G.W. 1996. “Principles of Good Practice in Service-Learning.” In Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices, ed. Jacoby, B.. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Moore, William P., Jianas, Linda, Hellmer, Tricia, Jones, Robin, and Gonzalez, Stephanie. 1998. Public Achievement in Kansas City: Evaluation of the First Year of Implementation. Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauffmann Foundation.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 1986. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Waterman, Alan S., ed. 1997. Service-Learning: Applications from the Research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar