Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T17:06:19.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support at Any Distance? The Role of Location and Prejudice in Public Opposition to the “Ground Zero Mosque”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2013

Brian F. Schaffner
Brian F. Schaffner*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2010, a debate erupted about plans to construct a mosque (as part of a larger multicultural center) approximately two blocks from Ground Zero in New York City. The main justification given by those who opposed the mosque was that building it so close to Ground Zero would appear to be insensitive. Public opinion appeared to support this notion, as large majorities of Americans registered their opposition to the mosque in surveys conducted at the time. In this article, I examine whether distance was, in fact, an important factor influencing citizens' opposition to the mosque. Using a survey experiment, I asked for opinions on the building of a mosque while randomizing how far the mosque was located from Ground Zero. Results from the experiment indicate that opposition to the mosque was unaffected by how far the mosque would be located from Ground Zero, but strongly influenced by factors such as partisanship, ideology, and tolerance for out groups.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 753 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian F.. N.d. “Re-Examining the Validity of Different Survey Modes for Measuring Public Opinion in the US: Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison.” Unpublished Manuscript. Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Licari, Frederick C.. 1989. “Education and Political Tolerance.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, Regina, Dillingham, Gavin, Dunaway, Johanna, and Miller, Beth. 2007. “Anglo Voting on Nativist Ballot Initiatives: The Partisan Impact of Spatial Proximity to the US-Mexico Border.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (3): 882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, Ryan D. 2010. “What Tearing Down Public Housing Projects Teaches Us about the Effect of Racial Threat on Political Participation.” Unpublished Manuscript. Google Scholar
Kalkan, Kerem O., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2009. “‘Bands of Others’? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 847–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Low, Setha M. 2004. “The Memorialization of September 11: Dominant and Local Discourses on the Rebuilding of the World Trade Center Site.” American Ethnologist 31 (3): 326–39.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra L.. 1995. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2006. “Arab and Muslim Americans and Islam in the Aftermath of 9/11.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (4): 608–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Chelsea E., and Shaw, Greg M.. 2009. “Trends—Tolerance in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (2): 404–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John M., and Gross, Kristin A.. 2007. “Stereotypes of Muslims, Their Causes, and Their Consequence.” Unpublished Manuscript. Google Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1992. Communism, Conformity, and Civil liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar