Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:33:49.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Study of Campaign Consultants: A Subfield in Search of Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

James A. Thurber
James A. Thurber*
Affiliation:
American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The central theme of this PS symposium is that political consultants are important in politics, that they have an impact on campaigns and elections. This is not news to political consultants or candidates running for office. Candidates and consultants know they need each other and the rapid growth and diversification of the profession reveals that sense of interdependence (see Thurber 1995). Though professional political consulting outside of political party organizations has been around since the 1930s, it has only recently sparked interest among political scientists. Why have consultants been ignored by political scientists? Why have consultants ignored political scientists (see Thurber and Nelson 1995)? Why is there little or no theory related to political consultants? Why do we know so little about the profession of political consultants? What subfield houses the study of political consulting: elections and voting behavior, political parties, political communications, political advertising, campaign management?

Political scientists have studied campaigns, elections, and political parties from a variety of views and methodologies, but few have focused on political consultants and their influence. Political campaigns are efforts to win elections to public office by informing the voters of a candidate's issue positions, by persuading the electorate to vote for a candidate, by activating partisans, and by mobilizing supporters. Election campaigns are combats over ideas and ways to persuade groups of voters to support those ideas. Studies have treated campaigns as symbolic events, as propaganda activities with the power to change voter preferences, and as a determinant variable in elections, but there is little consensus among political scientists about the role consultants play in campaigns.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 145 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research support for this article came in part from a three-year Pew Charitable Trusts grant for “Improving Campaign Conduct” and from the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University. This study will survey a national sample of professionals in the consultant industry subfields (i.e. pollsters, media specialists, fundraisers, grassroots specialists, and campaign managers) to describe who they are, what they do, and what their attitudes and opinions are about what they do. The results of this survey will be available in June 1998. David Dulio and Marni Ezra Goldberg provided assistance in the review of the campaign consultant literature.

References

Agranoff, Robert. 1972. The New Style in Election Campaigns. Boston: Holbrook Press.Google Scholar
Baus, H.M., and Ross, W.B. 1968. Politics Battle Plan. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bloom, M.H. 1973. Public Relations and Presidential Campaigns: A Crisis in Democracy. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1980. The Permanent Campaign: Inside the World of Elite Political Operatives. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Farrell, David, eds. 1992. Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelko, Kirsten la Cour, and Herrnson, Paul S. 1997. “Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 50:121–35.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M. 1997. “Political Consultancy Overseas: The Internationalization of Campaign Consultancy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Guzzetta, S.J. 1987. The Campaign Manual: A Definitive Study of the Modem Political Campaign Process. Anaheim, CA: Political Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul. 1989. “National Party Decision Making Strategies and Resource Distribution in Congressional Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 42:301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul. 1992. “Campaign Professionalism and Fund-Raising in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 54:859–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul. 1995. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S., and Copeland, Gary A. 1997. Inside Political Campaigns: Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., 1956. Professional Public Relations and Political Power. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Robin, and Logan, Angela. “Political Consultants and the Extension of Party Goals.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Luntz, Frank I. 1988. Candidates, Consultants and Campaigns: The Style and Substance of American Electioneering. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Magleby, David, and Patterson, Kelly. “Consultants and Direct Democracy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Matalin, Mary, and Carville, James. 1994. All's Fair: Love, War, and Running for President. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
McCuan, David, Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 1997. “Grassroots Democracy and California's Political Warriors: Campaign Professionals and the Initiative Process.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Joe. 1969. The Selling of the President 1968. New York: Trident Press.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K. 1997a. “Is there a Spin Doctor in the House?: The Impact of Political Consultants in Congressional Campaigns.” Ph.D. diss. Purdue University.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K. 1997b. “Party Support and Consultant Use in Congressional Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K., and Lenart, Silvo. 1997. “The Influence of Political Consultants in the 1992 Congressional Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napolitan, Joseph. 1972. The Election Game and How to Win It. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Nimmo, Dan. 1970. The Political Persuaders: The Techniques of Modern Election Campaigns. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Perry, J.M. 1968. The New Politics: The Expanding Technology of Political Manipulation. New York: Clarkson N. Potter.Google Scholar
Petracca, Mark P. 1989. “Political Consultants and Democratic Governance.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22(1): 11–14.Google Scholar
Petracca, Mark P., and Wierioch, Courtney. 1988. “Consultant Democracy: The Activities and Attitudes of American Political Consultants.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry J. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Selnow, Gary. 1994. High-Tech Campaigns: Computer Technology in Political Communication. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shea, Daniel M. 1996. Campaign Craft: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Campaign Management. Westport, CT.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Thurber, James. 1995. “The Transformation of American Campaigns.” In Campaigns and Elections: American Style, ed. Thurber, James A. and Nelson, Candice J. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thurber, James., and Nelson, Candice J., eds. 1995. Campaigns and Elections: American Style. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, Gene. 1968. The Image Candidates: American Politics in the Age of Television. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar