Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:51:35.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State-Level Forecasts of U.S. Senate Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Kedron Bardwell  and
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Kedron Bardwell
Affiliation:
Grand Valley State University
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Election forecasting, as a science with models to be tested, got its start in political science 20 years ago (Lewis-Beck and Rice 1984; Rosenstone 1983). When the enterprise began, it was not popular. Forecasts, while entertaining, were not held to be serious research. As high-quality models with accurate forecasts were published in leading journals (see review in Lewis-Beck and Rice 1992), forecasting achieved more respect in the discipline. The 1996 presidential election was a high point. Forecasters formulated models that accurately predicted, well in advance, the presidential winner's vote share (Campbell and Garand 2000). This encouraged forecasters to ply their trade for new elections, and in 2000 scholars again met media demands to predict the presidential vote. On the front page of the Washington Post in May, one forecaster predicted a Gore victory and was quoted as saying, “It's not even going to be close” (Kaiser 2000). In the end, most of the 2000 forecasts greatly overestimated Gore's share of the vote.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 821 - 826
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz Alan. 2002. “Who Will Win in November: Using the Generic Vote Question to Forecast the Outcome of the 2002 Midterm Election.” In Symposium on Mid-Term Elections, APSA Elections, Public Opinion and Voting Behavior Section, http://www.apsanet.org/~elections/archives.html (accessed October 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Abramowitz Alan, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1986. “Determinants of the Outcomes of U.S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics 47: 433–39.Google Scholar
APSA Elections, Public Opinion, and Voting Behavior Section. 2002. Symposium on Mid-Term Elections. http://www.apsanet.org/~elections/archives.html (accessed October 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Atkeson Lonna R., and Randall W. Partin. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89: 99–107.Google Scholar
Campbell James E., and James C. Garand, eds. 2000. Before the Vote. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fox John. 1991. Regression Diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fund John. 2002. “Polling Isn't Perfect.” OpinionJournal.com, November 14, 2002.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 2002. “Generic Ballot Question for the US House, October 27–31, 2002.” http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2002.htm (accessed June 15, 2002).Google Scholar
Gerber Alan. 1998. “Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables.” American Political Science Review 92: 401–411.Google Scholar
Green Donald P., and Jonathan S. Krasno. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 884–907.Google Scholar
Hibbing John R., and John R. Alford. 1982. “Economic Conditions and the Forgotten Side of Congress: A Foray into U.S. Senate Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 12: 505–15.Google Scholar
Higgins A. J. 2002. “Poll: Collins Holds Big Lead over Pingree.” Bangor Daily News, May 22, 2002, A4.Google Scholar
Iowa Electronic Markets. 2002. “Iowa Electronic Markets Leaning toward Status Quo in U.S. Congress.” http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/media/10_17_02.html (accessed October 21, 2002).Google Scholar
Jacobson Gary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson Gary C. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 334–362.Google Scholar
Jacobson Gary C. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th Ed. Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson Gary C. 2002. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Kaiser Robert G. 2000. “Is This Any Way to Pick A Winner?” Washington Post, May 26, 2000, A1.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S. 1985. “Election Forecasts in 1984: How Accurate Were They?” PS: Political Science and Politics 18: 53–62.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1984. “Forecasting Presidential Elections: A Comparison of Naïve Models.” Political Behavior 6: 9–21.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2002. “Mid-Term Election Forecast: A Democratic Congress.” In Symposium on Mid-Term Elections, APSA Elections, Public Opinion, and Voting Behavior Section, http://www.apsanet.org/~elections/archives. html (accessed October 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Lublin David. 1994. “Quality, Not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952–1990,” Journal of Politics 56: 228–41.Google Scholar
Mann Thomas E., and Norman J. Ornstein. 1984. “Congressional Elections: What's Ahead?” Public Opinion (June/July): 43–46.Google Scholar
Meara Emmet. 2001. “Pingree Kicks Off Campaign vs. Collins.” Bangor Daily News, June 7, 2001.Google Scholar
Milligan Susan. 2002. “Control of US Senate a Focus of Maine Race.” Boston Globe, June 3, 2002, A1, A4.Google Scholar
National Journal. 2001. “Sen. Susan Collins biography page.” http://www.nationaljournal.com (accessed December 1, 2001).Google Scholar
Nichols John. 2001. “Women: Key to the Senate?” The Nation, September 17, 2001, 14–18.Google Scholar
Patterson Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Rosenstone Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Squire Peverill. 1992. “Challenger Profile in Gubernatorial Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 45: 125–42.Google Scholar
Steen Jennifer. 2002. “Surge-and-Decline and the 2002 Elections.” In Symposium on Mid-Term Elections, APSA Elections, Public Opinion, and Voting Behavior Section, http://www.apsanet.org/~elections/archives.html (accessed October 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Tufte Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar