Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:50:44.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2005

Cameron G. Thies  and
Robert E. Hogan
Cameron G. Thies
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Robert E. Hogan
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Debates over methodology have long occupied a prominent role in political science and its various empirical sub-fields. Recently, these debates and occasional dialogues seem to have intensified. The Perestroika movement within APSA protested the perceived hegemony of rational choice and quantitative methods in journal publications and graduate training (Kasza 2001). Renewed attention has focused on the types of methodologies employed by studies published in the discipline's leading journals (Garand and Giles 2003; Bennett, Barth, and Rutherford 2003; Braumoeller 2003). The kinds of concerns over methodological diversity that motivate these studies also inform discussions about graduate training (Alvarez 1992; Dyer 1992; Schwartz-Shea 2003; Morrow 2003; Smith 2003).

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 293 - 297
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams Greg. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduate Methods.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 2–4.Google Scholar
Alvarez R. Michael, ed. 1992. “Methods Training: Student Perspectives.” Political Methodologist 5 (spring): 2–9.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2000. APSA Survey of Political Science Departments: A Report for the 1999–2000 Academic Year. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2002. Directory of Political Science Faculty: 2002–2004, 1st Edition. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Bennett Andrew, Aharon Barth, and Kenneth R. Rutherford. 2003. “Do We Preach What We Practice? A Survey of Methods in Political Science Journals and Curricula.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 373–378.Google Scholar
Bennett D. Scott. 2002. “Teaching the Scientific Study of International Relations to Undergraduates.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (March): 127–131.Google Scholar
Braumoeller Bear F. 2003. “Perspectives on Pluralism.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 387–389.Google Scholar
Burns Nancy Elizabeth. 1990. “Methodology in Graduate Political Science Programs.” Political Methodologist 3 (winter): 9–10.Google Scholar
Clawson Rosalee, Aaron Hoffman, and James A. McCann. 2001. “If We Only Knew Then What We Know Now: A Few Reflections on Teaching Undergraduate Quantitative Methods Courses.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 4–5.Google Scholar
Couper M. P. 2000. “Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 464–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer James A. 1992. “A Survey of Political Science Research Methods Courses.” Political Methodologist 5 (spring): 17–19.Google Scholar
Garand James C., and Micheal W. Giles. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (April): 293–308.Google Scholar
Hewitt J. Joseph. 2001. “Engaging International Data in the Classroom: Using the ICB Interactive Data Library to Teach Conflict and Crisis Analysis.” International Studies Perspectives 2 (November): 371–383.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 2002. “The Lamentable State of Science Education in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (March): 113–116.Google Scholar
Hojnacki Marie. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduates About the Quantitative Study of Politics.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 5–6.Google Scholar
Janda Kenneth. 2001. “Teaching Research Methods: The Best Job in the Department.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 6–7.Google Scholar
Kasza Gregory. 2001. “Perestroika: For an Ecumenical Science of Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (September): 597–599.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduate Methods: Overcoming ‘Stat’ Anxiety.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 7–9.Google Scholar
McBride Allan. 1994. “Teaching Research Methods Using Appropriate Technology.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (September): 553–557.Google Scholar
McBride Allan. 1996. “Creating a Critical Thinking Learning Environment: Teaching Statistics to Social Science Undergraduates.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (September): 517–521.Google Scholar
Morrow James D. 2003. “Diversity through Specialization.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 391–393.Google Scholar
Odell John S. 2001. “Case Study Methods and International Political Economy.” International Studies Perspectives 2 (May): 161–176.Google Scholar
Poggione Sarah. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduate Methods for the First Time.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 10–11.Google Scholar
Rodgers Pamela, and Cecilia Manrique. 1992. “The Dilemma of Teaching Political Science Research Methods: How Much Computers? How Much Statistics? How Much Methods?” PS: Political Science and Politics 25 (June): 234–237.Google Scholar
Schaefer David R., and Don A. Dillman. 1998. “Development of a Standard E-mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (autumn): 378–397.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Shea Peregrine. 2003. “Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 379–386.Google Scholar
Segal Jeffrey. 2002. “Teaching the Scientific Study of Law and Courts to Undergraduates.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (March): 117–119.Google Scholar
Selingo Jeffrey. 2003. “What Americans Think About Higher Education.” Chronicle of Higher Education (May 2): A10–A16.Google Scholar
Sills Stephen J., and Chunyan Song. 2002. “Innovations in Survey Research: An Application of Web-Based Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 20 (spring): 22–29.Google Scholar
Smee Alan, and Mike Brennan. 2000. “Electronic Surveys: A Comparison of E-mail, Web and Mail.” ANZMAC 2000: Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, 1201–1204.Google Scholar
Smith Rogers M. 2003. “Progress and Poverty in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 395–396.Google Scholar
Stanton J. M. 1998. “An Empirical Assessment of Data Collection Using the Internet.” Personnel Psychology 51: 709–726.Google Scholar
Stone Peter. 2001. “Making the World Safe for Methods.” Political Methodologist 10 (fall): 9–10.Google Scholar
Thies Cameron G. 2002. “A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 3 (November): 351–372.Google Scholar
Wahlke John C. 1991. “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (March): 48–60.Google Scholar