Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:02:35.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Proposed Guidelines for Advocacy in the Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ellis M. West
Ellis M. West*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 805 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

References

Ackerman, Felicia. 1996. “Be Reasonable and Do It My Way: Advocacy in the College Classroom.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
American Association of University Professors. 1995. “Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students.” In AAUP Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Ernst. 1996. “Some Implications of the Faculty's Obligation to Encourage Student Academic Freedom for Faculty Advocacy in the Classroom.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brand, Myles. 1996. “The Professional Obligations of Classroom Teachers.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Glennon, Fred. 1995. “The Learning Covenant: Promoting Freedom and Responsibility in the Religious Studies Classroom.” The Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin 24(April): 32–37.Google Scholar
Gold, Penny. 1996. “A Teacher Is Either a Witness or a Stranger.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lee v. Weisman. 1992. 505 U.S. 577.Google Scholar
Miranda v. Arizona. 1966. 384 U.S. 436.Google Scholar
Markie, Peter. 1996. “The Limits of Appropriate Advocacy.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pennock, J.R., and Chapman, J.W., eds. 1972. Coercion. Chicago: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Pinsker, Sanford. 1995. “Those Who Can, Do. Those Who Can't, Advocate.” Wall Street Journal, June 29, A16.Google Scholar
Strossen, Nadine. 1996. “First Amendment and Civil Liberties Traditions of Academic Freedom.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Voll, John O. 1966. “Advocacy and Explanation: The Problems of Explaining Adversaries.” In Advocacy in the Classroom: Problems and Possibilities, ed. Spacks, Patricia M.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. 1988. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar