Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:14:50.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Science Expertise and Policymaking. Comparing U.S., French, and EU Think Tanks: Similar Model Different Paths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Benoit F. Monange
Benoit F. Monange
Affiliation:
University of Grenoble, France, and Centennial Center Visiting Scholar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relationship between social science and policymaking, marked with “tension and ambiguity,” is one that scholars never ceased to be perplexed about (Anderson 2003). My research seeks to shed light on the interaction between the two by comparing how the “think tank model of expertise,” first developed in the U.S., is being emulated in the EU and in France where the political systems and the structures of social knowledge traditionally called for a different use of social science research. By looking at the comparative evolution of the think tank model I also wish to question the building of the expert as a modern figure that bridges a discursive regimen of “knowledge claim” used in the scientific world and a regimen of “truth-claim” consistent with political discourses (Veitl 2005; Leclerc 2001). Scrutinizing the activities of think tanks as a place where “experts” claim to inform and influence policymakers is, in that sense, a way to revisit and rethink the relations between power and knowledge (Ihl 2006).

Type
Association News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 909
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Donald E. 2002. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lisa. 2003. Pursuing Truth, Exercising Power: Social Science and Public Policy in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Elisabeth. 2008. “Research Groups Boom in Washington.” New York Times, January 30.Google Scholar
Dror, Yehezkel. 1989. “Required Breakthroughs in Think Tanks.” Policy Sciences 16 (3): 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Michael J., and Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight Over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ihl, Olivier, ed. 2006. Les ⟨⟨sciences⟩⟩ de l'action publique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Gérard. 2001. «Histoire de la vérité et généalogie de l'autorité.» Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 111 (2): 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. 1999. “The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (December): 757–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Andrew, and Weaver, Kent. 1998. “Advocates and Analysts: Think Tanks and the Politicization of Expertise in Washington.” In Interest Group Politics, ed. Cigler, Allan and Loomis, Burdett. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Saurugger, Sabine. 2002. “L'expertise: Un mode de participation des groups d'intérêts au processus décisionnel communautaire.” Revue fran[,]caise de science politique 52 (4): 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veitl, Philippe. 2005. “A qui pensent les experts? Paroles d'experts et paroles sur l'expertise.” In Le recours aux experts. Raisons et usages politiques, ed. al, Laurence Dumoulin et. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 15–35.Google Scholar