Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:51:29.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Networks in Political Science: Hiring and Placement of Ph.D.s, 1960–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2007

James H. Fowler ,
Bernard Grofman  and
Natalie Masuoka
James H. Fowler
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Natalie Masuoka
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Social scientists have long been interested in how academic disciplines are organized (Ben-David and Collins 1966; Kuhn 1970; Lipset 1994; Rojas 2003; Somit and Tanenhaus 1964; 1967). One important element of this organization is the network of Ph.D. placements among Ph.D.-granting institutions. Various authors have linked the structure of placements to prestige rankings of departments (for sociology departments see e.g., Hanneman 2001; and Burris 2004; for political science departments see Masuoka, Grofman, and Feld 2007c), or have used various features of the structure of academic exchange networks to examine the shaping of disciplinary careers and practices (Feld, Bisciglia, and Ynalvez 2003; Masuoka, Grofman, and Feld 2007b). There is also a more general literature on status and market exchange (see e.g., Podolny 2005).We are indebted to Clover Behrend-Gethard for bibliographic assistance.

Type
THE PROFESSION
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 729 - 739
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelder, W. H., and N. J. Bershad. 1979. “Statistical-Analysis of a Thurstonian Model for Rating Chess Players.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 19 (1): 39–60.Google Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph, and Randall Collins. 1966. “Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology.” American Sociological Review 31: 451–65.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. “Factoring and Weighing Approaches to Clique Identification.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2: 113–20.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (March): 1170–82.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., and Martin G. Everett. 1999. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures.” Social Networks 21: 375–95.Google Scholar
Burris, Val. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review 69: 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Scott L., Michael G. Bisciglia, and Marcus Ynalvez. 2003. “Why Your Department Has Placed Fewer Students Than the One That Trained You: Principles of Directed Mobility as a Consequence of In-Out Variation.” Working Paper. Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. K. 1984. The Geography of Underdevelopment: A Critical Survey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Sangick Jeon. 2007. “The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent.” Social Networks, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., Timothy R. Johnson, James F. Spriggs II, Sangick Jeon, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2007. “Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Supreme Court Precedents.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1: 215–39.Google Scholar
Garand, James, and Kristy Grady. 1999. “Ranking Political Science Departments: Do Publications Matter?” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (1): 113–6.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Scott Feld, and Natalie Masuoka. 2005. “Direct and Indirect Influence Among Political Science Departments.” Center for the Study of Democracy. Paper 05-14. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/05-14/.Google Scholar
Hanneman, Robert. 2001. “The Prestige of PhD Granting Departments of Sociology: A Simple Network Approach.” Connections 24: 68–77.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael, and John Mark Hansen. 2006. “Building the Chicago School.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert, and Randolph Silver. 1996. “Rating the Ranking: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (2): 155–60.Google Scholar
Kamada, T., and S. Kawai. 1989. “An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs.” Information Processing Letters 31: 7–15.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Jon M. 1999. “Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment.” Proceedings of ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 668–77.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1994. “The State of American Sociology.” Sociological Forum 9 (2): 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007a. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (1): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007b. “The Production and Placement of Political Science Ph.D.s, 1902–2000.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (2): 361–6.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007c. “Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (3): 531–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–4.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur, Charles Tien, and Andrew Peebler. 1996. “Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (4): 704–17.Google Scholar
Podolny, Joel. 2005. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. H., and C. P. Loomis. 1951. “Analysis of Sociometric Data.” In Research Methods in Social Relations, eds. P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt. New York: Dryden Press, 561–86.Google Scholar
Rice, Tom, James McCormick, and Benjamin Bergmann. 2002. “Graduate Training, Current Affiliation and Publishing Books in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4): 751–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, Fabio. 2003. “Organizational Decision Making and the Emergence of Academic Disciplines.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1964. American Political Science: A Profile of the Discipline. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. New York: Boston, Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar