Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:17:22.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Snubbing Seth Rogen: Does Celebrity Testimony Increase Congressional Hearing Attendance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Matthew D. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Long Beach City College
Darin DeWitt
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach

Abstract

Academic and popular accounts hold that celebrity activists command the attention of political elites. One manifestation of this idea is that celebrities garner greater congressional attention at committee hearings than the substantive experts who typically serve as witnesses. This implies that Members of Congress do not value interaction with experts and are willing to forego those interactions to allocate time to activities with low opportunity costs—activities unimportant enough that they can be passed up for a celebrity encounter. To evaluate these claims, we examined hearing attendance during a 20-year period. We found that celebrity witnesses have little effect on member attendance rates, which suggests that celebrities are a less efficacious route to congressional attention than is commonly believed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, Matthew, Deam, Maria, and Uscinski, Joseph E.. 2014. “What’s a Dog Story Worth?” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (3): 819–23.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1991. “Should Stars Set the Agenda?” New York Times, March 10.Google Scholar
Busby, Joshua William. 2007. “Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry.” International Studies Quarterly 51: 247–75.Google Scholar
Chaffetz, Jason (jasoninthehouse). 2009. “Rob Lowe in the House watching us vote on school lunches. He wasn’t in Breakfast Club, was he? Nah.” March 9, 2009, 4:02 p.m. Tweet.Google Scholar
Dagnes, Alison. 2011. Sex Scandals in American Politics. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Demaine, Linda J. 2009. “Navigating Policy by the Stars: The Influence of Celebrity Entertainers on Federal Lawmaking.” Journal of Law and Politics 25: 83143.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 2000. “Information and Congressional Hearings.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 5165.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. “Foreign Policy Goes Glam.” The National Interest. November/December: 22–8.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W. and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 531–64.Google Scholar
Heitshusen, Valerie. 2012. Senate Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., and Talbert, Jeffrey C.. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 657–71.Google Scholar
Juvenile Diabetes. 2000. Senate Hearings before the Committee on Appropriations. 106th Congress, 1.Google Scholar
Larkin, Kathryn Gregg. 2009. “Star Power: Models for Celebrity Political Activism.” Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal 9 (1): 155–80.Google Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M. 1995. “Issue Group Resources and Testimony at Congressional Hearings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (3): 431–9.Google Scholar
Marsh, David, Hart, Paul ‘t, and Tindall, Karen. 2010. “Celebrity Politics: The Politics of the Late Modernity?” Political Studies Review 8: 322–40.Google Scholar
Matthews, Chris. 2014. Hardball with Chris Matthews, February 26.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S. and Gamson, Joshua. 1995. “The Challenge of Cultural Elites: Celebrities and Social Movements.” Sociological Inquiry 65 (2): 181206.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 2013. Informing the News. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. 2004. How Journalists See Journalists in 2004: Views on Profits, Performance and Politics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 2004. The Congressional Experience: Transforming American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rogen, Seth (SethRogen). 2014. “Not sure why only two senators were at the hearing. Very symbolic of how the Government views Alzheimer’s. Seems to be a low priority.” February 26, 2014, 3:04 p.m. Tweet.Google Scholar
Strine, Harry Cornelius. 2004. “Stars on Capitol Hill: Explaining Celebrity Appearances in Congressional Committee Hearings.” Purdue University: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Talbert, Jeffrey C., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 383405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrall, A. Trevor, Lollio-Fakhreddine, Jaime, Berent, Jon, Donnelly, Lana, Herrin, Wes, Paquette, Zachary, et al. 2008. “Star Power: Celebrity Advocacy and the Evolution of the Public Sphere.” International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (4): 362–85.Google Scholar
Warren, Larry. 1986. “The Other Side of the Camera: A TV Reporter’s Stint as a Congressional Aide.” PS: Political Science and Politics 19 (1): 43–8.Google Scholar
West, Darrell M. and Orman, John. 2003. Celebrity Politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 2005. “A Theory of Media Politics: How the Interests of Politicians, Journalists, and Citizens Shape the News.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified March 2005. PDF file.Google Scholar