Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:12:56.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sizing Up Candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Bruce Buchanan
Bruce Buchanan*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Europeans, says the New York Times, are “amused” at the “exacting moral yardsticks” applied to Americans seeking high public office (Markham, 1987). The American people, a Times-Mirror poll reports, are not amused but irritated—at what they regard as media overkill on candidate character (Rosenstiel, 1987). Influential Washington Post columnist David Broder deplores the tendency of political reporters to “swoop down” on presidential candidates with embarrassing questions about “the sin of the week,” and calls for guidelines to help reporters stay on course (Broder, 1987). Another Times-Mirror poll finds that only 14 percent of Americans give top priority to candidate character. Instead, a whopping 49 percent felt a candidate's “ability to accomplish things” was most important, while 33 percent gave the highest priority to “stand on issues” (Skelton, 1987).

These reactions, though skewed by media treatment of 1988 presidential candidates like Hart, Biden, and Robertson, nonetheless raise important questions about how Americans take the measure of would-be leaders. How reasonable, for example, are the priorities assigned by the Times-Mirror poll respondents to the various qualifications for office? Which among the evaluated categories (character, competence and issue position) affords the surest forecast of eventual presidential performance? Whatever its evaluative priority, what dimensions of character are relevant to the presidency and measurable in candidates? How can presidential competence be defined, and the extent of its presence in candidates assessed? When is the most appropriate time during the campaign to examine character, competence and issue position? Below are some answers offered as food for thought.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Spring 1988 , pp. 250 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. and Weko, Thomas. 1988. The Presidency and the Election Process: Campaign Strategy, Voting, and Governance. In Nelson, Michael, ed., The Presidency and the Political System, 2nd ed. Washington: CQ Press: 151–268.Google Scholar
Barber, James David. 1985. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Third edition.Google Scholar
Broder, David S. November 16, 1987, p. A10. ‘Snooping’ Hurts Candidates and Press. Austin American Statesman.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1978. The Presidential Experience: What the Office Does to the Man. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. October 2, 1987A. p. 25. Open All Candidates Before Election. New York Times.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1987B. The Citizen's Presidency: Standards of Choice and Judgment. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1987C. Constrained Diversity: The Organization Theory of the Presidency. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. December, 1987D. The ′88 Election: Defining the Agenda. The World and I pp. 39–46.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. November 8, 1987E. After Reagan, Who? A Composite Portrait of ‘Mr. Right.’ Miami Herald, p. 1F.Google Scholar
Fishel, Jeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. and Abelson, Robert P. 1981. Appraising Presidential Candidates: Personality and Affect in the 1980 Campaign. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, N.Y. Google Scholar
Markham, James M. November 12, 1987, p. 17. Europeans Amused by U.S. Scrutiny of Candidates. New York Times.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul. Presidential Competence. 1988. In Nelson, Michael, ed. The Presidency and the Political System, 2nd ed. Washington: CQ Press, 161–184.Google Scholar
Rosenstiel, Thomas B. November 19, 1987, p. A4. Public Faults Media Focus on Candidates' Character. Austin American Statesman.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Skelton, George. October 1, 1987, p. A7. Voters Say Ability Ranks Above Issues or Character. Austin American Statesman.Google Scholar