Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:42:18.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shaw v. Reno and the Hunt for Double Cross-Overs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Timothy G. O'Rourke*
Affiliation:
Clemson University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Some of the ideas presented here are drawn, in modified form, from O'Rourke 1994. A much longer presentation of my ideas will appear in a forthcoming issue of the Rutgers Law Journal. In the interest of disclosure, I note that I served as an expert witness, pro bono, for the plaintiffs in Shaw v. Hunt (1994). I also testified as an expert for the plaintiffs in Johnson v. Miller, a Shaw-type challenge to Georgia's 11th Congressional District.

References

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, and Issacharoff, Samuel. 1993. “Race and Redistricting: Drawing Constitutional Lines After Shaw v. Reno .” Michigan Law Review 92:588651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Gordon E. 1986. “Whatever Happened to the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States?” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Connor v. Finch. 1977. 431 U.S. 407.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 1993. “Would Vince Lombardi Have Been Right If He Had Said: ‘When It Comes to Redistricting, Race Isn't Everything, It's the Only Thing’?” Cardozo Law Review 14:1237–76.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 1994. “What Color Is Your Gerrymander?” The Washington Post. 27 March.Google Scholar
Hays v. Louisiana. 1993. 839 F.Supp. 1188 (W.D. La.)(three-judge court); vacated, 62 U.S.L.W. 3859 (1994); invalidating substitute plan, 862 F. Supp. 119 (W.D. La., 1994) (three-judge court); review granted, 63 U.S.L.W. 3454 (1994).Google Scholar
Johnson v. De Grandy. 1994. 62 LW 4755.Google Scholar
Johnson v. Miller. 1994. 864 F. Supp. 1354 (S.D. Ga.) (three-judge court); review granted, 63 U.S.L.W. (January 6, 1995).Google Scholar
Karcher v. Daggett. 1983. 462 U.S. 725.Google Scholar
Major v. Treen. 1983. 582 F.Supp. 325 (E.D. La.) (three-judge court).Google Scholar
Mayhew, David J. 1971. “Congressional Representation: Theory and Practice in Drawing the Districts.” In Reapportionment in the 1970s, ed. Polsby, Nelson W.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Timothy G. 1992. “The 1982 Amendments and the Voting Rights Paradox.” In Controversies in Minority Voting: A Twenty-Five Year Perspective on the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Davidson, Chandler. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Timothy G. 1994. “Crazy Quilts Then and Now: Shaw v. Reno and the Legacy of Baker v. Carr .” Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H. and Niemi, Richard G.Expressive Harms, ‘Bizarre Districts,’ and Voting Rights: Evaluating Election District Appearances After Shaw,” Michigan Law Review 92:101205.Google Scholar
Pope v. Blue. 1992. 113 S. Ct. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw v. Hunt. 1994. No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR. U.S. Dist. Ct., E.D.N.C. (August 1) (three-judge court).Google Scholar
Shaw v. Reno. 1993. 61 U.S.L.W. 4818.Google Scholar
Thornburg v. Gingles. 1986. 478 U.S. 30.Google Scholar
Vera v. Richards. 1994. 861 F. Supp. 1304 (S.D. Tex.) (three-judge court). Page reference is to the slip opinion.Google Scholar
Wright v. Rockefeller. 1964. 376 U.S. 52.Google Scholar