No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Science of Politics—as Civic Education—Then and Now
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2004
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2004 by the American Political Science Association
References
American Political Science Association Committee on Instruction.
1916
The Teaching of Government.
New York:
Macmillan.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association Committee on High School Civics.
1922
“The Study of Civics.”
American Political Science Review 24
(supplement):
116-25.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association Task Force on Civic Education in the 21st Century.
1998
“Expanded Articulation Statement.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
31
(September):
636-37.Google Scholar
Bennett Stephen Earl.
1999
“The Past Need Not Be Prologue: Why Pessimism about Civic Education is Premature.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
32
(December):
755-57.Google Scholar
Bryce James.
1903
The Relations of the Advanced and Backward Races.
Oxford:
Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dietz Mary G., and
James Farr.
1998
“‘Politics Would Undoubtedly Unwoman Her’: Gender, Suffrage, and American Political Science.”
In Gender and American Social Science: The Formative Years,
ed. Helene Silverberg.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dubnick Melvin.
2003
“Nurturing Civic Lives: Developmental Perspectives on Civic Education—Introduction.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
36
(April):
253-55.Google Scholar
Dunning William A.
1937
Truth in History and Other Essays,
ed. J. G. de Roulhac Hamilton.
New York:
Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goodnow Frank S.
1905
“The Work of the American Political Science Association.”
Proceedings of the American Political Science Association for 1904:
35
46.Google Scholar
Hart Albert B.
1906
“The Realities of Negro Suffrage.”
Proceedings of the American Political Science Association for 1905:
149-65.Google Scholar
Haskell Thomas L.
1977
The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth Century Crisis of Authority.
Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Haskins Charles H.
1904
“Report of the Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the American Historical Association.”
Annual Report of the American Historical Association for 1903.
Washington:
Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Leonard Stephen T.
1995
“The Pedagogical Purposes of a Political Science.”
In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions,
eds. James Farr,
John S. Dryzek, and
Stephen T. Leonard.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard Stephen T.
1999
“‘Pure Futility and Waste’: Academic Political Science and Civic Education.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
32
(December):
749-56.Google Scholar
Mitchell S. C., and
Henry Shepherd.
1906
“Discussion of Hart on Negro Suffrage.”
Proceedings of the American Political Science Association for 1905:
166-70.Google Scholar
Morris H. C.
1905
“Discussion of Reinsch on Colonial Autonomy.”
Proceedings of the American Political Association for 1904:
139-40.Google Scholar
Moses Bernard.
1905
“Colonial Policy with Reference to the Philippines.”
Proceedings of the American Political Science Association for 1904:
88
116.Google Scholar
Munro William Bennett.
1928
“Physics and Politics—An Old Analogy Revised.”
American Political Science Review
22:
1
11.Google Scholar
Novick Peter.
1988
That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam Robert D.
2000
Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.
New York:
Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Reinsch Paul S.
1904
“The American Political Science Association.”
Iowa Journal of History and Politics
2:
155-59.Google Scholar
Schachter Hindy Lauer.
1998
“Civic Education: Three Early American Political Science Association Committees and Their Relevance to Our Times.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
31
(September):
631-35.Google Scholar
Somit Albert, and
Joseph Tanenhaus.
1967
The Development of Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism.
Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Walton Hanes,
Cheryl M. Miller, and
Joseph P. McCormick.
1995
“Race and Political Science: The Dual Traditions of Race Relations Politics and African-American Politics.”
In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions,
eds. James Farr,
John S. Dryzek, and
Stephen T. Leonard.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willoughby W. W.
1898
The Rights and Duties of American Citizenship.
New York:
American Book Company.Google Scholar
Willoughby W. W.
1904
“The American Political Science Association.”
Political Science Quarterly
19:
107-11.Google Scholar