Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:21:19.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of the Historical Advisory Committee, 1990–94, in the Declassification of U.S. Foreign Policy Documents and Related Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Betty Glad  and
Jonathan Smith
Betty Glad
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia
Jonathan Smith
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Vincent Davis of the Patterson School of International Diplomacy for his valuable comments and critiques on this work. Davis is the current APSA representative on the State Department's Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation.

References

Boren, David, and Pell, Clairborne. 1990. “Why U.S. Foreign Policy Records are “a Fraud.” Boston Globe, May 27. Reproduced in Congressional Record—Senate 19 October 1990, pp. S16299–S16301.Google Scholar
Bush, George. 1991. “Statement by the President,” 28 Oct.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1989. “Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation March 1989.” Copy in SHAFR Newsletter.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1990a. “At the State Department, Historygate,” New York Times 8 May.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1990b. “Gaps in the Record: How State has Allowed History to be Incomplete.” Foreign Service Journal 67(8): 27–9.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1990c. “Stop Falsifying U.S. History,” World Monitor 3(10): 14–17.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1994a. Telephone Interview with Jonathan Smith, 21 November 1994.Google Scholar
Cohen, Warren. 1994b. “Secret Records Feed Mistrust,” Christian Science Monitor 17 November: 11.Google Scholar
Dewar, Helen. 1990. “Senate Panel's Quest: Filling Gaps in History of Foreign Relations,” Washington Post 11 June: A13.Google Scholar
Edel, Wilbur. 1991–1992. “Diplomatic History—State Department Style,” Political Science Quarterly 106 (Winter): 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D. 1963. Mandate for Change, 1953–1961. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Flowerree, Charles, et al. (several members of State/HDR), 1990. “History With Integrity.” Foreign Service Journal 67(11): 4–6.Google Scholar
Jehl, Douglas. 1995. “Clinton Revamps Policy on Secrecy of U.S. Documents,” New York Times 18 April: A1.Google Scholar
Kamen, Al. 1990. “Historians Say Secrecy Distorts Foreign Policy Chronicle,” Washington Post 16 April: A13.Google Scholar
Kimball, Warren. 1992. “Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for the Period October 1990-November 1991, HAC Files, Department of State.Google Scholar
Kimball, Warren. 1993. “Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for the Period December 1991-December 1992.” HAC Files, Department of State.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Warren. 1994a. “Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for the Period January 1993-June 1994.” Copy in SHAFR Newsletter, December.Google Scholar
Kimball, Warren. 1994b. “Letter to Warren Christopher, 1 July.” Copy in SHAFR Newsletter, December, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Kimball, Warren. 1994c. Telephone Interview with Jonathan Smith, 14 December 1994.Google Scholar
Kuniholm, Bruce. 1990. “Foreign Relations, Public Relations, Accountability and Understanding.” Perspectives 28 (May/June).Google Scholar
LaFantasie, Glenn, ed. 1994a. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958–1960, vol. XVII Indonesia. Washington: Department of State, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
LaFantasie, Glenn, 1994b. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958–1960, vol. XVIII Japan and Korea. Washington: Department of State, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
LaFantasie, Glenn, 1995. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, vol. IX Foreign Economic Policy. Washington: Department of State, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Miller, Page P. 1991. “The Integrity of the US Department of State Historical Series Is at Stake.” Government Publications Review 18.Google Scholar
Miller, Page P. 1994. Telephone Interview with Jonathan Smith, 15 October 1994.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1990. Editorial, “History Bleached at State” 16 May: A26.Google Scholar
Relyea, Harold C. 1992. The Evolution of Government Information Security Policy: A Brief Overview (1972–1992). Washington: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Kermit. 1979. Countercoup, The Struggle for Control of Iran. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan. 1995. “Insider and Outsider Strategies and the Passage of the Foreign Relations Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993.” Paper prepared for round-table discussion at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1994. Charter of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, April.Google Scholar
United States Congress. 1991. Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993, 22 USC 2651, 24 June.Google Scholar
Winkler, Karen. 1990. “Historians Criticize State Department for ‘Distortions’ and ‘Deletions’ in Its Record of U.S. Foreign Policy.” Chronicle of Higher Education 4 April: A6.Google Scholar