Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:43:45.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roads “Drawn” to Modernity: Religion and Secularism in Contemporary Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2007

Hakkı Taç  and
Meral Uğur
Hakkı Taç
Affiliation:
Bilkent University
Meral Uğur
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Editorial cartoons do not just mirror politics, but are also themselves a part of politics. They are more than single-panel graphical commentaries on daily policies, for they construct their own claims on truth. The cartoonist can use the polysemic nature of visual signs and present a distinct framing perspective. Editorial cartoonists with certain ideological stances can become an actor in “the struggle for cultural supremacy,” in Tarrow's (1998) term. This struggle refers to efforts by the state, media, and social movements to influence the interpretative processes by which individuals negotiate the meaning of events. This paper analyzes the editorial cartoons in Turkish daily newspapers in terms of their competing framings of contemporary Turkey's secularist-Islamist division. Secularism and Islamism refer here to political projects that seek to transform and reinstitute a sociopolitical order on the basis of some constitutive norms (Çınar 2005, 8–9).

Type
SYMPOSIUM—GLOBAL POLITICS
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 311 - 314
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akman, A. 1997. “From Cultural Schizophrenia to Modernist Binarism: Cartoons and Identities in Turkey, 1930–1975.” Princeton Papers: Interdisciplinary Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 6 (2): 83–133.Google Scholar
Akyol, E. 2003. Cartoon. March 28. Milliyet.Google Scholar
Akyol, E. 2003. Cartoon. May 18. Milliyet.Google Scholar
Akyol, E. 2003. Cartoon. May 31. Milliyet.Google Scholar
Arnold, T. W. 2002. Painting in Islam: A Study of the Place of Pictorial Art in Muslim Culture. New Jersey: Gorgias Press LLC.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. 1983. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Harvester Wheatsheaf, NY: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Çetinkaya, D. 2002. Cartoon. April 29. Çizgi-Yorum, Zaman.Google Scholar
Çetinkaya, D. 2003. Cartoon. December 8. Çizgi-Yorum, Zaman.Google Scholar
Çetinkaya, D. 2004. Cartoon. January 6. Çizgi-Yorum, Zaman.Google Scholar
Çetinkaya, D. 2005. Cartoon. December 31. Çizgi-Yorum, Zaman.Google Scholar
Çınar, A. 2005. Modernity, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places, and Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1984. “ The Kemalist Regime in Comparative Perspective: Some Cooperative and Analytical Remarks.” In Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey, ed. J. M. Landau. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Göle, N. 1996. Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kutay, F. 2006. “Çizgileri Bizi Aşıyor (His Lines Overstep Us)”; “Okur Hattı (The Reader Line).” Zaman, April 8.Google Scholar
Toprak, B. 2005. “Islam and Democracy in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 6 (2): 167–86.Google Scholar
Selçuk, T. 2001. Cartoon. November 3. Cumhuriyet.Google Scholar
Selçuk, T. 2006. Cartoon. April 19. Cumhuriyet.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar