Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:41:28.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retreading Familiar Terrain—Bias, Peer Review, and the NSF Political Science Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

Lee Sigelman  and
Frank P. Scioli Jr.
Lee Sigelman
Affiliation:
National Science Foundation
Frank P. Scioli Jr.
Affiliation:
National Science Foundation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Winter 1987 , pp. 62 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, Stephen and Cole, J. R. 1978. Peer Review in the National Science Foundation: Phase II of a Study. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Conference Board of Associated Research Councils, Committee on an Assessment of Quality-Related Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. 1982. An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Harnad, Stevan. 1982. Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Quality Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R. 1976. Perceptions of the National Science Foundation Peer Review Process: A Report on a Survey of NSF Reviewers and Applicants. Washington, DC: NSF.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Robert L. August 6, 1986. Scholars Fault Journals and College Libraries in Survey by Council of Learned Societies. Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
Mishler, William. 1984. Trends in Political Science Funding at the National Science Foundation, 1980–1984. PS (Fall): 846–853.10.1017/S0030826900622555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitroff, Ian I. and Chubin, Daryl E. 1979. Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy Analysis. Social Studies of Science 9: 199–232.10.1177/030631277900900203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, Stanley. 1982. Reviewer Reliability: Confusing Random Error with Systematic Error of Bias. In Harnad, Stevan, ed., Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Quality Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Senate. June 5, 1986. Congressional Record. 99th Cong., second sess., p. S6897. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar