Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T13:50:35.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to “An Incremental Approach to PresidentialNomination Reform” and “Meaningful Participation and the Evolutionof the Reformed Presidential Nominating System”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2009

Paul Timmermans
Affiliation:
University of Denver

Extract

In the January issue of PS, papers by William Mayerand by Lonna Atkeson and Cherie Maestas investigate reforms of theparty nomination procedure for presidential candidates. In order toavoid the amplification of name recognition and early fundraisingadvantages, as these effects resulted from the “frontloading” ofstate nominations ('08 Tsunami Tuesday), broader “spacing” betweenprimary dates may be required. But such an expansion of thesequential voting principle carries an unfortunate disadvantageignored in the papers. This disadvantage is the, however unintended,consequence of candidates manipulating their program in accordanceto methods through which votes are being cast.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable