Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zpzq9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T04:38:56.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Ethics Governance and Political Science in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Tony Porter
Tony Porter
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The governance of research ethics in Canada, including its research ethics boards (REBs),which correspond to the institutional review boards in the U.S., often is portrayed as anexemplary model of cross-disciplinary cooperation and consultation that is altruisticallystriving to protect research subjects from abuses in biomedical, social sciences, andhumanities research. While there is indeed a great deal of altruism and good intention amongthose involved in this governance, power and interests also play a role that is ofparticular concern for political scientists. Governance arrangements have been driven bybiomedical research, which is vastly better funded than social sciences and humanities (SSH)research. These arrangements have been imposed on the SSH research community with littlesensitivity to the distinctive problems of SSH research, despite concerns about suchproblems that political scientists and other SSH researchers have expressed for a decade. Arecent proposal initiated by major research funders to dramatically strengthen researchethics governance has generated even more alarm.

Type
Symposium—Protecting Human Research Participants, IRBs, and Political Science Redux
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 495 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amyot, Grant. 2002. “Report on Consultation Meeting on the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Human Subjects.” Canadian Political Science Association, May 29. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/template_e.cfm?folder=about&page_name=ethics_amyot_e.htm (April 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Blackstone, Mary, Given, Lisa, Keating, Bernard, Levy, Joseph, McGinn, Michelle, Palys, Ted, and van den Hoonaard, Will. 2007. Comments on the Draft Report of the Experts Committee for Human Research Protection in Canada. Social Sciences and Humanities Working Committee. http://www.sfu.ca/~palys/SSHWCResponseToMovingAhead-final.pdf (April 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). 2006–2007. Touching Lives. Annual Report. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34768.html (April 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Caulfield, Timothy. 2005. “Legal and Ethical Issues Associated with Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: The Case of Competitive Enrolment.” Health Law Review 13 (2–3): 58–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Chaiton, Alf, Paquet, Gilles, and Wilson, Christopher. 2000. “Governance of the Ethical Process for Research Involving Human Subjects.” Centre on Governance, March 15. http://www.christopherwilson.ca/papers/final_ethics_report.pdf (April 10, 2008).Google Scholar
CIHR, NSERC, and SSHRC. 1998. “Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.” With 2000, 2002, and 2005 amendments. http://www.ncehr-cnerh.org/english/code_2/ (April 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Economic, and Social Research Council. 2006. Research Ethics Framework. http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk (April 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Experts Committee for Human Research Participant Protection in Canada. 2007. Moving Ahead. Draft Report, August 15. http://www.hrppc-pphrc.ca/english/consultation.html (April 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Health Canada. 2006. “Clinical Trials Regulatory Framework Review: Results of 2006 E-Consultation.” Health Products and Food Branch, December. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca (April 9, 2008).Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael. 2000. “The Current Context of HRIHS.” In The Governance of Health Research Involving Human Subjects (HRIHS), ed. al, Michael McDonald et. Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
Sciences, and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). 2006–2007. Annual Report.Google Scholar
Social Sciences, and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee (SSHWC). 2004. Giving Voice to the Spectrum. http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/workgroups/sshwc/SSHWCVoiceReportJune2004.pdf (April 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007. Science Statistics. Catalogue 88-001-XIE, March.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2008. “Gross Domestic Expenditures on Research and Development.” Table 358-0001, CANSIM database.Google Scholar
Zywicki, Todd J. 2007. “Institutional Review Boards as Academic Bureaucracies: An Economic and Experiential Analysis.” Special Issue, Northwestern University Law Review 101 (2): 861–95.Google Scholar