Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:40:07.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reputational Rankings of Peer-Reviewed Law Journals: A Survey Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2018

Paul M. Collins Jr.
Paul M. Collins Jr.*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents the results of the first-ever survey that captures how political scientists view peer-reviewed law journals with regard to overall impact, familiarity, and article quality, as well as reading and submission preferences. In addition, it examines the extent to which the evaluation of journal quality differs depending on a researcher’s methodological approach. I find that scholars generally agree on a set of top peer-reviewed law journals, although some differences do exist based on the methodological approach of the respondent. These results can be used by a wide range of scholars to formulate publication strategies and evaluate the scholarly productivity of their peers.

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 377 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychological Association. 2016. “Law and Human Behavior.” http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/lhb/.Google Scholar
Arena, Phil. 2014. “Ranking IR Journals.” http://duckofminerva.com/2014/01/ranking-ir-journals.html.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D. 2016. “Where is International Relations Going? Evidence From Graduate Training.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 486–98.Google Scholar
Crawford, Scott D., Couper, Mick P., and Lamias, Mark J.. 2001. “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review 19 (2): 146–62.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 1997. “Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance.” Northwestern University Law Review 92 (1): 251–326.Google Scholar
Cullen, Colleen M., and Kalberg, Randall S.. 1995. “Chicago-Kent Law Review Faculty Scholarship Survey.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 70 (3): 1445–60.Google Scholar
Doyle, John. 2004. “Ranking Legal Periodicals and Some Other Numeric Uses of the Westlaw and Lexis Periodical Databases.” Legal Reference Services Quarterly 23 (2-3): 1–53.Google Scholar
Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies. 2016. “Judicature.” https://law.duke.edu/judicature/.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Wells, Martin T.. 2014. “Ranking Law Journals and the Limits of Journal Citation Reports.” Economic Inquiry 52 (4): 1301–14.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and King, Gary. 2002. “The Rules of Inference.” University of Chicago Law Review 69 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 1981. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…” Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–54.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1998. “Law Reviews and Legal Scholarship: Some Comments.” Denver University Law Review 75 (2): 661–68.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal W.. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (2): 293–308.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., Giles, Micheal W., Blais, Andre, and McLean, Iain. 2009. “Political Science Journals in Comparative Perspective: Evaluating Scholarly Journals in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (4): 695–717.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Garand, James C.. 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 741–51.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1975. “Political Scientists’ Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 8 (3): 254–56.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jerry A. 2016. “Journal Rankings in Sociology: Using the H Index with Google Scholar.” The American Sociologist 47 (2): 192–224.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2012. “TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries.” http://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/trip_around_the_world_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bryan W., and Rothgeb, John M. Jr. 2011. “So You Want Tenure? Factors Affecting Tenure Decisions in Political Science Departments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (3): 571–77.Google Scholar
Martinek, Wendy L. 2011. “Report of the Professional Committee of the Law and Courts Section.” Law & Courts 21 (3): 25–33.Google Scholar
McCormack, Nancy. 2009. “Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know About Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing.” Law Library Journal 101 (1): 59–70.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain, Blais, Andre, Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal. 2009. “Comparative Journal Rankings: A Survey Report.” Political Studies Review 7 (1): 18–38.Google Scholar
Newton, Brent E. 2012. “Law Review Scholarship in the Eyes of the Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Justices: An Empirical Analysis.” Drexel Law Review 4 (2): 399–416.Google Scholar
Rogelberg, Steven G., and Stanton, Jeffrey M.. 2007. “Understanding and Dealing with Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (2): 195–209.Google Scholar
Rothgeb, John M., and Burger, Betsy. 2009. “Tenure Standards in Political Science Departments: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (3): 513–19.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R. 2000. “The Most-Cited Law Reviews.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 389–96.Google Scholar
Stoan, Stephen K. 1984. “Research and Library Skills: An Analysis and Interpretation.” College & Research Libraries 45 (2): 99–109.Google Scholar
Whicker, Marcia Lynn, Kronenfeld, Jennie Jacobs, and Strickland, Ruth Ann. 1993. Getting Tenure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Woods, Patrick Arthur. 2014. “Stop Counting (Or At Least Count Better).” Presented at the Jotwell 2014 Conference, Coral Gables, Florida. http://jotwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Woods-Stop-Counting.pdf.Google Scholar
Wuffle, A. 1989. “Uncle Wuffle’s Advice to the Advanced Graduate Student.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22 (4): 838–39.Google Scholar
Zorn, Christopher. 2006. “Peer Review Redux.” http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2006/08/peer_review_red.html.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Collins Jr. supplementary material

Collins Jr. supplementary material 1

Download Collins Jr. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 106.3 KB